Lik-photo
I have again reverted you edits to Zone System. Your efforts to contribute to Wikipedia are appreciated, but two editors have found these edits unconstructive. Wikipedia articles reflect consensus, and defiant edits are not the way to achive this. Please discuss the points we've raised rather than make disruptive edits. JeffConrad (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I have given the reference to the printing edition and have calculated mathematics of zones of Adams. In article Adams's zonal theory is deformed.
11 zones contradict a graphic file 2^8 = 256 is 8 zones both completely black and completely white is 2 more zones. Only 10 zones. At increase in light exposure of each step in 2 times - an exposition basis.
Values of zones
1 from 1 to 2 11 from 2 to 4 111 from 4 to 8 1V from 8 to 16 V from 16 to 32 V1 From 32 to 64 V11 From 64 to 128 V111 From 128 to 256
Total 8 zones have width 1-256 is added 2 zones
0 - it is less 1 1X more than 256
Total 10
The zonal system is shifted under the digital technics on 1 unit that is not 1-256, but 0-255. It is a format of ALL graphic files.
Now try paint value of a graphic file 0-255 on 11 steps.....)))))
At you not editors, instead of competent people...)))) Which didn't read Adams's zonal theory.
Your recent edits edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)