LightKyle7

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warangal Tri-City (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warangal Tri-City and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warangal Tri-City, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! LightKyle7, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warangal Tri-City has been accepted

Warangal Tri-City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Love Jihad

I assume you are the IP who edited it recently. You really should read the article first before removing anything from the lead. The article makes it clear it's a conspiracy theory. Doug Weller talk 07:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

The Economist seems to be the latest non-governmental source, hardly biased. I agree that both Hindu and Islamic sources might be biased. Hindu sources that say there is no such thing probably aren't. Government sources will certainly be. You'll need consensus on the talk page to change the lead. Please reply here or on the talk page, not on my page. Doug Weller talk 08:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)