Leyen Douthard

Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bethel1.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bethel1.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Frank M. Reid, III

A tag has been placed on Dr. Frank M. Reid, III requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 20:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greater St. Stephens Full Gospel Baptist Church

A tag has been placed on Greater St. Stephens Full Gospel Baptist Church, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SharkxFanSJ (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Frank M. Reid, III

A tag has been placed on Dr. Frank M. Reid, III requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Advertising / External-link-only Edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--SharkxFanSJ (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland)

A tag has been placed on Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Baltimore, Maryland) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Empowerment Temple A.M.E. Church

A tag has been placed on Empowerment Temple A.M.E. Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Temple of Praise

A tag has been placed on The Temple of Praise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.    7   ^{talk | Δ |}   23:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Night of Champions (2009) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. TJ Spyke 02:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to No Way Out (2009), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 21:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to SummerSlam (2005), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 00:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WrestleMania XX, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 18:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WWE Hell in a Cell, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 20:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WWE Hell in a Cell, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:47, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Hell in a Cell, you will be blocked from editing. TJ Spyke 01:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Rumble (2009). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. TJ Spyke 21:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Royal Rumble (2010) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Please do not change the formatting, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide. TJ Spyke 22:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to WWE TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. TJ Spyke 23:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Night of Champions (2009), you will be blocked from editing. TJ Spyke 17:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to One Night Stand (2008), you will be blocked from editing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)