January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to WESLEE—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 17:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WESLEE. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 09:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma DD (February 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, LewyLytton! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma DD (February 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Emma DD has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emma DD. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Very kind, thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma DD (November 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Emma DD

edit
 

Hello, LewyLytton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emma DD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:54, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply