Your edits edit

Before changing an infobox image on any article, please gain a talk page consensus. DDMS123 (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don’t understand why can’t you change a picture as that picture as that was the original 2A02:C7C:98D2:7F00:48C3:81EB:9E12:5C05 (talk) 19:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
You still need a talk page consensus. DDMS123 (talk) 01:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Don't get it people just edit, so why are you going around editing my stuff Lew 283 (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Since changing images may disrupt consistency between other articles, you'll need a talk page consensus. Infobox images have always required a talk page consensus. Please see WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD. DDMS123 (talk) 18:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Charles I edit

I’ve changed the main inbox image to the original portrait of Charles I that was previously there Lew 283 (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD before making future edits. DDMS123 (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Change Charles I inbox image edit

I want to change the image,as current is a copy of the original and original is a nicer change Lew 283 (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023 edit

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Elisabeth of France (1602–1644). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:PORTRAIT where it states "It is often preferable to place a portrait (image or representation of a person) so that they "look" toward the text, but do not achieve this by reversing the image, which creates a false presentation. (Faces are never truly symmetric even in the absence of scars or other features.)". DDMS123 (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Princess Mary, Duchess of Gloucester and Edinburgh, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:PORTRAIT. DDMS123 (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

What was disruptive or inappropriate about the picture of Princess Mary Lew 283 (talk) 18:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Manual of style violations as the portrait added violates MOS:PORTRAIT. I suggest reading the full warning. DDMS123 (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Coronation of Mary I of England edit

You have made a mistake it says a groat on the images details and I know it's a groat by looking at it and I am a coin collector as it happens Lew 283 (talk) 19:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, I didn't read it correctly. I fixed the disambiguated link so that it actually links to the article about the coin. DDMS123 (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply