Level
Hello, Level, I'm Kafziel. I noticed you were new, or at least that nobody has officially welcomed you yet, so let me be the first to say hello, give you some tips, and share a few useful links.
Here are some links you might find helpful:
- User tutorial
- Help desk
- Policy on maintaining a neutral point of view
- Policy for content when editing articles and creating new ones
- Notability guidelines for people
- Tips for settling disputes
- Guidelines for properly writing and formatting articles
I know they're a little boring (okay... a lot boring) but they may come in handy someday.
I give every newcomer two tips for adding content: cite references whenever possible, and try to set aside any personal points of view. Aside from that, just be patient and receptive, ask questions whenever you need to, and have a good time. If you want to experiment with coding or see how articles will look before you post them, you can use your own private sandbox at User:Level/sandbox for any tests you want to do. (The link will turn blue after you start the page.)
Now that you have your own user name, you can sign your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically stamp your user name, the time, and the date. That will help other users reply to your posts. You may also want to fill out your user page to tell others a bit about yourself.
I hope this information is useful to you, and I'm looking forward to seeing your contributions. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me for help. Good luck, and happy editing!
- PS- It looks like you have been making contributions to an article that is set to be deleted. You may be looking for this article instead. It would be a good idea to have a look at the talk page before making any changes, though. Kafziel Talk 20:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
The List
editNo offense was intended; the note I left is pretty common practice here. There's even a template for it (here). I certainly didn't mean to imply that you were a sockpuppet, since I welcomed you and it's obvious that you and LeafGreen Ranger are two different people.
Anyway, I apologize if you were insulted by the message and the conversation that followed it. I don't want you to feel like you're not allowed to participate, and I'm sorry if my choice of words made it seem otherwise. Kafziel Talk 17:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's ok, I wasn't offended, and it wasn't a direct reply to you. Level 17:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Donna
editIf you had a reference, why didn't you cite it? Why make others do the footwork for you? I'll cite it this time, but next, you need to take the initiative, especially if there's some question. And just because only one person may have publicly questioned it, doesn't mean they were the only one who questioned that information. ~QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 08:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
The etymology of every name is sourced via reference #8 unless noted next to an etymology. See the top of the column. It has to be because this is a Featured List. All Featured Lists must have everything referenced. Don't say something is "easily found" when it is hidden in an obscure pdf file. Next time add the source in the first place instead of making idiotic snide comments. Bgwhite (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wow, something getting to you, sorry. By "easily found" I meant it is on the Tremonton, Utah page. The reason I did not add the source in the first place was that I am unfamiliar with how to properly cite things, as you can see with the way you had to fix it. I was hoping someone would take my edit in good faith and look into it, I guess I should have mentioned where it could be found though. -Lөvөl 04:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't mind if anybody puts in a reference with the wrong syntax. Nobody should mind. It is alot better than no reference.
- Who cares about Tremonton anyway? You either bypass it because you are going to Logan or go straight thru on your way to get lottery tickets. :) Bgwhite (talk) 06:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement
edit
Hello. I noticed you've made edits to articles related to the Latter Day Saint movement and thought you might be interested in participating in the WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. This project aims to serve as a hub for collaboration on elements of the Latter Day Saint movement, Mormonism, Latter Day Saint history, doctrine, practices, and other cultural effects inspired by Joseph Smith. You don't have to be a member of the Latter Day Saint movement to participate. Best wishes!
—Asterisk*Splat→ 21:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Level. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Level. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Level. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)