LeonieVP

AfC notification: Draft:Trevor M Jones has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Trevor M Jones. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

I am about to review this article, but I must first tell you our rule that if you have a conflict of interest because of a relationship with any of the organizations with which he is associated, you must declare it on your user page. See WP:COI for our policy. DGG ( talk ) 15:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trevor M Jones (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This article is essentially a press release, and therefore unacceptable. This is not just a matter of style; major rewriting is necessary. (I apologize for the previous review, which dealt only with trivia.)

There is a major problem with content. "He is responsible for the development of ....". If he was research director, he was indeed responsible in an administrative sense, but the people who actually did the research and development are responsible for the drug. If he actually led the research team directly, you need to cite the key article for which he was principal author. The proper wording is, During his tenure, the company introduced x, y, and z.

There are also problems with specific content. (1) I cannot find evidence in the material presented or the references or in the sequence of positions in linkedin that he ever held a regular professorship; apparently he holds or has held a visiting professorship though I am not sure of the years. I see he is widely referred to in press releases as "Professor", but we regard such an appointment as just one of his many honours. (2) We need place of birth, if know; we need dates for his degrees; we need the place and dates of his postdoc. (3) We consider being an editor of journals significant. Please invclude them, with the exact positions and the years.

There are still significant problems with style: After the first use of the full name, we refer to him simply as "Jones" . We do not use Dr. or Prof. , and we never use just the first name except for entertainers. We normally include a list of major positions, but not ever board on which he was a member. We do not duplicate material in both text and a separate list. We write in paragraphs, not isolated sentences.

• Please continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trevor M Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 16:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trevor M Jones has been accepted

Trevor M Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EBY (talk) 14:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of OptiBiotix Health for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OptiBiotix Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OptiBiotix Health until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AT Medics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AT Medics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)