Welcome edit

Hello, Lefteriswebmaster, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Codf1977

Happy editing! Codf1977 (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Speedy deletion nomination of Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC edit

 

A tag has been placed on Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

All the article said was that the firm existed, and had x employees in y offices. There was nothing to indicate that the firm was in any way notable. Flag icons, incidentally, do not contribute anything to an article like this. A mere 150 employees and 9 offices does not make a law firm notable in any way. The article had no significant sources, no links to articles about the firm and its practice, etc. Your username, incidentally, might also lead one to suspect that you're the webmaster for this firm (a major violation of our conflict of interest guidelines. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply