Leftboot83
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
December 2008 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to DDR Motorsport, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 14:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
LMS 2500 edit
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Redrose64#LMS_2500. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. It can be frustrating editing Wikipedia when you know something is out of date, but there are better ways of dealing with it, as I'll try to show below. Robevans123 (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Firstly, it is very frustrating when an organisation such as the National Railway Museum fails to keep its website site up-to-date regarding long term loans to other museums and railways. Also, it is commendable that editors try to keep the information on Wikipedia up-to-date. However, it is important to understand what Wikipedia is and how it works, and how the information given can be checked/challenged/changed.
For example, a photo of a locomotive at a location on a particular date is not sufficient to prove the locomotive is there on a long term basis. Even if the photo has a label saying something like "2500 is going to be at Barrow Hill for the next five years" that would not, in itself be valid proof for changing an article. All sorts of questions arise - Is the photo really of the named locomotive (people can do wonders with Photoshop!)? Is it really taken at Barrow Hill on the date shown (these things can be faked in the image's meta-data)? And why should I believe the person who wrote the label (they could be a fantasist who's only hope in life is that the NRM will lend their favourite locomotive to their favourite museum!...). This is why Wikipedia has policies and guidelines on things like Verifiability and Reliable sources.
In a similar vein, statements such as "It must be true - I saw it there" also carry little or no weight. At best, like the photo, it may offer some proof that the locomotive was there on a certain date (or it could be the work of the fantasist mentioned above!...). Again this is why Wikipedia has a policy on No original research.
Can I suggest that you look through the introductory articles listed at the top of this article - particularly the five pillars of wisdom (which include Wikipedia:Civility), and if you're interested in referencing Help:Referencing for beginners is a good starting point.
It can be frustrating when an edit gets reverted, but first take some time to follow through on the reasons given and give some thought to your reply.
And remember, people here are willing to help (I learnt a lot of what I know about referencing from an experienced, knowledgeable editor by the name of User:Redrose64), and if you can't find any information/help you need (again, the links shown above are a good starting point), just put a question on my or your talkpage. Regards Robevans123 (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your message, I will in future try harder. forgive the lack of indent, I do not know howLeftboot83 (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- No worries. Hope you stick around and contribute more. Indenting is easy (!) - just add a colon (:) at the start of the line as I've done here. Regards Robevans123 (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Great thank you for your help Leftboot83 (talk) 16:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Leftboot83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Leftboot83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Leftboot83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 edit
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to David Cameron— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)