Welcome! edit

Hello, Leehanson100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 17:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 17:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

I have obtained the signed permission (copyright) forms from the artist and photographer--to show the photograph that was deleted from my sandbox page for Hawk Alfredson; how do I get the photo reinserted? Please help me with... Getting the photo (and the signed copyright form) uploaded.

LeeHan 18:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC) leehanson100 LeeHan 18:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

If you have the permission to use the image, it shouldn't be a problem. You just need to use the correct copyright tag for the picture, please see Wikipedia:File copyright tags. Alex ShihTalk 18:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
The file name was wrong. I fixed it for you and added a copyright tag. Alex ShihTalk 19:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hawk Alfredson has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hawk Alfredson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting, March 22,2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting.jpg edit

Marchjuly has given much needed information concerning use of this image. However, it's still unclear if I have obtained "a clear and explicit declaration of consent from the photographer" by having her sign a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation license. Please note: the photographer was the artist's wife, and the form I had her sign states that she is the creator of the photograph and by signing the agreement "I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs . . . I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites . . . I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen." I also obtained a similar permission from the artist (Hawk Alfredson) since part of one of his paintings is shown in the photograph; it is my understanding that an artist always maintain the copyright on the _image_ that s/he creates. If this procedure and documentation doesn't allow the use of the photograph, would you please give me information about source of a "freely licensed equivalent image." I've done extensive searching, to no avail. LeeHan 20:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

There's really no 100% way for anyone to tell if the licensing documentation you have in your possession is actually OK for Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons without their actually seeing it. The editors who make such verifications are called OTRS volunteers. So, what you probably need to do is to send copies of all of the documentation you have to WP:Contact OTRS so that a volunteer can verify it. Please take the time to read through c:COM:OTRS for more details on what kinds of information is needed.
There are only so many volunteers and there tend to be lots of requests for verificatoin submitted, but someone will eventually get to it. If, by chance, a file or files are deleted in the meantime, do not panic and try and re-upload them. Files which are deleted are not really gone forever; they are hidden from public view and can be unhidden once their licensing has been verified. Once an email has been sent in, you may add Template:OTRS pending to the file's page. This will let others know that a verification email has been sent in, so that they do not delete the file while it's waiting to be reviewed. Once the email has be entered into the OTRS system, an OTRS volunteer will add Template:OTRS received to the file's page. Files whose licensing has been verified by OTRS will have Template:OTRS permission added to their pages, so that other editors are aware that the file's licensing is OK. If there is a problem with the licensing, then OTRS will not accept the file and let the person emailing them know.
The person emailing OTRS will receive a reply containing an OTRS ticket number. This is sort of like a "case number" and can be used for reference whenever you discuss the file with OTRS. Because of the sometime sensitive information contained in OTRS emails, only OTRS volunteer can typically access them. If you are not the actual person who sends in the email, you may in turn find your access to OTRS information limited out due to privacy concerns; however, if you have any questions about the status of an email, etc., the best thing to do is to ask for assistance at WP:OTRSN.
Finally, please start signing your talk page posts correctly. There's a special way of signing posts on Wikipedia that will add all the required links and time stamps. The easiest way to sign a post is to use 4 tilde as explained at WP:TILDE. If you have any more general questions, please feel free to ask them here. However, I am not an administrator or an OTRS volunteer, so there is certain things I cannot do and certain information I do not have access to wit respect to Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Hawk Alfredson, Artist and Painting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawk Alfredson (September 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Leehanson100, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawk Alfredson (October 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RileyBugz会話投稿記録 23:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawk Alfredson has been accepted edit

 
Hawk Alfredson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ravenswing 07:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Leehanson100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply