Hello there. I noticed that you created the Milt Stegall. Good job, it's about time he gets a page. However there is one problem: it looks like you cut-and-pasted almost every sentence on that page from either the Bombers profile or the Cincinnati Post article. You can put copyrighted text into Wikipedia because it would be a violation of that copyright. Please keep this in mind when creating new articles. Qutezuce 04:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be fine just the list them as references in the "References" section at the end. Qutezuce 04:50, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

97 B-Line edit

Good work on the 97 B-Line article. I was planning to create that but unfortunately, I am not too familiar with that particular B-Line. Anyways, I was wondering how familiar you are with the 97, because I think a list of stops and transfer points (similar to the ones on 98 B-Line and 99 B-Line) would spice that page up a bit. Again, good stuff! :) --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK!. 21:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Length of the Vancouver skytrain system? edit

You added to the Vancouver Skytrain article that the addition of the Evergreen line will mean that Vancouver has Canada's most extensive system.

But the article also says that the Evergreen line will not run on a separate right of way. If you are going to count light rail that doesn't run on a separate right of way, to compare apples with apples, shouldn't you have to count all of the Toronto streetcar system?

Most of the TTC streetcar system shares the road with citizen's vehicles. But the new Spadina and Queen's Quay lines have a separate right of way. It is about 4-6 km long. There is a portion of the Queen Street line, From Roncevalles to the Humber Loop, which has had a separate right of way for 48 years. That is another 2-4 km. Toronto is planning to resculpt St Clair Avenue, to provide the streetcars with a separate right of way along that route. That would be another 8-10 km.

If you count light rail which both shares the streets and has sections with a separate right of way Toronto's clearly remains the longest. If you count only that portion of the light rail system which have a separate right of way Toronto may still remain the longest. How long will the Evergreen line be? How much of it will have a separate right of way?

The TTC's streetcar system is 308 km long. -- Geo Swan 17:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vibrant Districts in Winnipeg edit

I put up the category you create, Vibrant Districts in Winnipeg, for deletion. You can see the discussion about this at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Vibrant_Districts_in_Winnipeg. Qutezuce 06:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey! edit

Hey, Lee -- how are you? Nice to see you on Wikipedia now! What've you been up to? -- Andy Saunders 19:16, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stafford Street edit

Hey there. Hate to bring bad news, but Stafford Street has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this street might not be notable enough for an article. Please review WP:NOT and WP:N for general concerns. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 04:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

COI concerns edit

 

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Marcus Haber, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 13:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hunterintense.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hunterintense.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Huntersnowman.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Huntersnowman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Broadwaybear.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Broadwaybear.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC) --Ricky81682 (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply