Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

edit
 

Hi LeannJordan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Welcome!

edit

Hello, LeannJordan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 22:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Alan Amron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Alan Amron.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Alan Amron.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 22:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alan Amron.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Alan Amron.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Amron may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with 16 successful products licensed based on those awarded issued patents over the years. [http://www.slideshare.net/AlanBAmron/alan-amron-inventions-that-you-will-recognize?ref=http%3A%2F%

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Entertech, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Entertech. Areaseven (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Amron may have broken the syntax by modifying 22 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Amron invention claims

edit

Thanks for asking the question, but it looks like you went ahead and posted the content anyway. I've cut it and explained why at Talk:Alan Amron. I notice every edit you've made to Wikipedia since 2012 has been related to Amron - if you have any personal or business relationship with him, I'd recommend reading WP:COI before making any further edits to these articles. --McGeddon (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Amron invention published and important publicly known facts cited

edit

Thank you McGeddon,

Yes, I did repost it back up only after I received other Wikipedia editors in sandbox, who suggested how best I should post it.

Yes, because I only comment in Wikipedia on what I fell I have knowledge of. I am an aspiring inventor myself.

I noticed that you have over the years a special interest in editing 3M Post-it notes Wikipedia page posts. Can you please disclose here how and if you are in any personal and or business contact or relationship with 3M, Post-it notes or any one affiliated with or for them?

I didn't know of and or about Amron before 2011 when I read of Amron inventions in published reliable reports, and so I reached out to connect with Amron on LinkedIn.

I read in 2012, when I first cited on Wikipedia about Amron inventions, the questions and discussions that the Wikipedia community had on Amron and the Post-it note "claims". Now in 2014, 2 years later, I found these new published facts on Amron Post-it notes claims, so I cited them. Certainly I waited long enough to cite these additional published important facts to Wikipedia.

I feel as an aspiring inventor myself, after reading about Amron the inventor and all his accomplishments, and then reading the outrageous claims of how 3M invented the Post-it notes, it was something that the additional publicly known and published facts be noted (cited) about.

There is no denying that Amron had a factual published and known public records roll in the Post-it notes history, and as Wikipedia is a source for that important encyclopedia published known public facts and information, what better place for it to be documented.

I would appreciate it if you would correctly edit my Amron Post-it notes simple paragraph, that you have so quickly each time deleted without corrections (with all the research effort that I put into it) back up on the Amron Wikipedia page ASAP.

Thank you,

LeannJordan

There's no way for me to "correctly edit" your paragraph because Wikipedia require reliable sources for all content, and your suggested content has none - as explained (to you?) two years ago at Talk:Post-it_note#Amron, court documents and press releases are not reliable sources.
I'm happy to reassure you that I have absolutely no personal or professional connection to the 3M corporation or to Post-It Notes as a product. --McGeddon (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

McGeddon thank you for that, but your Not entirely correct, they are not all from the same MarketWire press release, (see the updated citing post below) and most press publications and news organizations use only creditable press releases and gathered information, and companies such as Yahoo Finance and Reuters News Wire publish only those that they believe to be reliable sources. See other more recent 2014 blog and publications that I listed that talk about Amron inventions and include discussions on the his Post-it note. I would appreciate either you correct what I posted, or post it as I wrote it in the same speed in which you so quickly deleted it each time. Amron has in fact invented the Press-On Memo pads and the facts and public information on it is readily available on line. ----

References

  1. ^ "Alan Amron invented Press-on Memo Records". "Yahoo Finance". Retrieved 2011-2-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  2. ^ "Post-it Notes Inventor Alan Amron Pens the Truth in New Tell-All Memoir". "Reuters News Wire". Retrieved 2011-2-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  3. ^ "Who really invented Post-it Notes". "ESB Journal". Retrieved 2011-2-14. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  4. ^ "Even god needs sticky notes". "Inside Nancy's Noodle". Retrieved 2012-2-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ Sports Blog "Amron embraces new concept for the NFL". "Z Smart's Blog". Retrieved 2013-9-27. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  6. ^ "First Down Laser Line Needed in football yesterday". "Sports Techie". Retrieved 2014-6-6. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  7. ^ "3M Post-it notes Press on inventor pens the truth". "Brides Best Blog". Retrieved 2011-7-6. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  8. ^ "Alan Amron inventor of Post-it Notes". "Technology Meet Ups". Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  9. ^ Notes Inventor Alan Amron Pens the Truth in New Tell-All Memoir "Post-it notes inventor pens the truth". "Digital Media". Retrieved 2011-2-23. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  10. ^ "AMRON vs. 3M Litigation US Federal Court Records" (PDF). "US Federal Court". Retrieved 1997-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  11. ^ "AMRON vs. 3M Litigation US Federal Court Records" (PDF). "US Federal Court". Retrieved 1997-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  12. ^ "3M Settlement Letter Records". "3M". Retrieved 1998-2-3. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  13. ^ "AMRON vs. 3M Litigation US Federal Court Records" (PDF). "US Federal Court". Retrieved 1997-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  14. ^ "AMRON vs. 3M Litigation US Federal Court Records" (PDF). "US Federal Court Case Docket". Retrieved 1997-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  15. ^ "US Patent and Trademarks Office Records". "United States Patent & Trademark Office". Retrieved 1982-6-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

Pasting bits of talk pages into other talk pages

edit

Please stop doing this! Edits like this one are incredibly confusing, because to anyone reading it looks like I was responding to a two-year-old thread, when I clearly wasn't. Just post a new comment saying what you want to say, in your own words. --McGeddon (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, LeannJordan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by   Bfpage |leave a message  23:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, LeannJordan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by   Bfpage |leave a message  00:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply


Discouraged In The Wikipedia System to Provide the Full History of all Subject Matter

edit
After months have gone by, and I see that there is no editorial support for the multiple posted actual historical facts in this Amron Post-it notes history issue, from any other credible Wikipedia editors, I LeannJordan can no longer believe in the credibility and or the honesty of any of the provided history and or facts in and of the entire Wikipedia system.

Which is supposed to be an historical record of all the facts and issues. One lone Wikipedia editor has successfully prevented important historical facts in the Amron Post-it notes history to be posted. Happy Holidays! December 18, 2014 LeannJordan LeannJordan (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply