User talk:LeadSongDog/Archives/2014/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
German translations in trans_title
In the article "The Organon of the Healing Art" the German version of book title "Organon of Medicine" is translated as "Organon der Heilkunst" and the German version of title "Organon of homoeopathic medicine" is stated as "Organon der rationellen Heilkunde". So those are the settings for parameter 'trans_title' as meaning the "translated title" of the book's title, in this case translated for the German language. Please restore those trans_title parameters. -Wikid77 (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Wikid77: Please check the template doc or Help:CS1. You'll see that
|trans_title=is for the English translation of|title=, not the other way around. LeadSongDog come howl! 00:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)- That said, perhaps we still need a way to do what you were trying to do. I seem to recall that orig_title used to serve that purpose in the pre-Lua era. LeadSongDog come howl! 00:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Researchgate
LeadSongDog, do you have access to Researchgate? If not, do you know someone who does? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. Tried wp:RX? LeadSongDog come howl! 03:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Resource Exchange: Wikipedia Library Research Coordinator?
Hi there! I see you're quite active at WP:RX, which we recently grouped under the broader Wikipedia Library project to help editors access sources and do better research. I'm looking for a few coordinators to take the lead on some research-related initiatives, including keeping things tidy at WP:RX and possibly at a new research desk, or with curating research guides. Would you be interested? It's a volunteer position and we could talk about what kind of projects and time would work for you. Hope to hear from you soon. Cheers, Jake Ocaasi t | c 14:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for asking, but I prefer to stay ad hoc. I'll stick my nose in from time to time. LeadSongDog come howl! 16:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!
Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
- Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
- Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
- To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–invite}}~~~~
- To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
{{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}}~~~~
- You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
FILAIR
Hi, I noticed that you added the logo for the airline Filair to their Wikipedia page back in 2008. I know it's a long time ago but I was wondering if you had any information about this airline and if they still exist. I've been going through the list of Congolese airlines and I've been find some very suspicious articles for airlines that either no longer exist or perhaps even airlines that never existed at all and might have been created as part of a scam (e.g. Sky fly Airlines). Please let me know if you have any information on Filair. Cheers!Monopoly31121993 (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- The logo was redrawn based on this no free photo. Filair was, like other DRC airlines, a pretty yet marginal operation, with old aircraft and poor clientele. Many have little visibility abroad, aside from news reports of crashes, but Filair showed up in Flightinternational's "Directory of World Airlines". It was a real carrier. LeadSongDog come howl! 01:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
US Airways Flight 1549 detail discrepancy to resolve
Hi. Would you please take a look at this detail re. US Airways Flight 1549 and contribute to resolving the discrepancy b/w what's stated in the article, what's logically possible, and what's reported in at least half of the sources cited? Greatly appreciate your attention to this matter and hope it is something that can be resolved quickly and w/o complication. Thanks, Azx2 19:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)