Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lavezzicavani3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 1 November

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Are you User:The name (previously User:Evropariver)?

edit

Since you and User:The name (previously User:Evropariver) have ignored what I stated in this section so far, I'm giving you another chance to answer, this time by commenting directly on your talk page. Are you User:The name? If it turns out that you are once I get around to thoroughly investigating the matter, the situation will be worse for you than just admitting that you are him and sticking to one account after that. In addition to any behavioral evidence I find, a WP:CheckUser has ways of determining if you are operating both accounts or other accounts in addition to the two. And the longer you two stay silent on this matter, the likelier I am to believe that you two are the same person. If you and/or The name are ready to respond, I ask that you reply here at your talk page to keep the discussion jointed (see WP:TALKCENT). I have this user page/talk page and The name's user page/talk page on my WP:Watchlist, so I will know if you respond. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Instead, I'll just keep monitoring your edits, and report the matter if I feel I've gathered enough evidence. You edit too much like The name, who hasn't edited (well, under that account anyway) since I asked the above question, and who has yet to deny being you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Then again, if you are the same person, but you are now sticking to one account (Lavezzicavani3), that is an improvement. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Care to explain your last revert?

edit

Do you care to explain your last edited which removed an edited source under "blue eyes." Source here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51544239_DNA-based_eye_colour_prediction_across_Europe_with_the_IrisPlex_system I suggest you revert it or I will be in the next 24 hours. Before removing a previous post it is wise to explain why... - Galati

Care to explain your last revert? (2)

edit

So why not restore the figure, and change the category to "observed eye colour frequency" instead of predicted.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spaniards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply