Lauriecansfield

Hi Laurie - I read through the content and it looks good, but I think there may be too many spaces - just takes up a lot of space. Just an aesthetic value thing... Thanks Corwil (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lauriecansfield. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_June_27#User:Lauriecansfield.2FPotts_Print_.28UK.29.
Message added SPhilbrickT 16:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

welcome

Hello Lauriecansfield! Welcome to English Wikipedia
Thanks you for your participation in this project. We hope that you will stay and contribute, and that you will find the experience enjoyable. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, it is free for all to use and anyone may edit it. There are certain guidelines and principles that all users are expected to follow. These principles and guidelines are listed below—click on a link for more information.
	The five pillars of Wikipedia The fundamental principles of the project		Help Wikipedia's help section
	Tutorial This tutorial is a basic guide to editing		Your user pages and your sandbox How to experiment and edit in your user space
	Mentoring program Ask an experienced editor to be your mentor		How to start a page Help on creating your first article
	Things to avoid How to avoid common errors and mistakes		Style Guide How to write in an acceptable style
	Main policies of Wikipedia An introduction to Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines		Frequently asked questions Some common questions and their answers
	Help Desk Here you can ask other editors for assistance		Quick reference A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki
This page is your Talk page. Here you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you should put your signature, by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing the button in the editor bar—shown here in the picture. Do not sign in the articles themselves. See When signatures should and should not be used for more information. Can't see this message properly? Click here for a simpler version.

--SPhilbrickT 16:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Potts Print (UK)

The article Potts Print (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable company.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice

The firm is probably notable, but the detail in the article made it almost unsupportable.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Don't just assert historical importance give references for it. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release. Remember not to copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the firm and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material, such as the number of Macintosh computers of each model that you use, that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients--that sort of content is considered promotional-- Enough so, that if I had not decided to edit most of it out, which is beyond the scope of normal editing, I would have considered deleting the entire article as promotional . And nobody outside the company itself will care just which devices you turn off when not in use to save energy. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, which are usually more expansive. I did considerable reformatting to make the appearance more encyclopedic.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. DGG ( talk ) 21:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Potts Print (UK)

The article Potts Print (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self-promotion and publicity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. King Rikk (talk) 07:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)