Dinosaur behavior edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Dinosaur behavior, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Fabrictramp 21:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Dinosaur behavior edit

Dinosaur behavior, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Dinosaur behavior satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur behavior and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Dinosaur behavior during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fabrictramp 14:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

August 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Atlanta, Georgia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AUTiger » talk 20:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of CMU chemlab 1 students edit

 

A tag has been placed on CMU chemlab 1 students, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Bfigura (talk) 03:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as CMU chemlab 1 students, you will be blocked. Bfigura (talk) 03:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Lindsay liu edit

 

A tag has been placed on Lindsay liu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta 22:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Lindsay Liu(lab).jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Lindsay Liu(lab).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Lindsay_Liu_(lab).jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lindsay_Liu_(lab).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sigma Tau Gamma, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sigma Tau Gamma was changed by Laurensmells (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-01T00:13:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

October 2009 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Foot fetishism. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 13:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply