Welcome! edit

Hello, Larsconks, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SMG4, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SamHolt6 (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of SMG4 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SMG4, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Undeleteable edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Undeleteable requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TimothyJosephWood 20:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Larsconks, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 20:08, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TimothyJosephWood 20:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bluedog and Belly Productions edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bluedog and Belly Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nthep was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nthep (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

YouTube edit

Hey Larsconks. Just wanted to let you know that since you seem to be interested in this area, you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube where there are a lot of editors working to improve articles related to YouTube. You may want to consider taking our interactive tutorial at the Wikipedia Adventure, because it can help get you used to the way things work on Wikipedia. But we're always happy to have new editors, and no matter what you're interested in, there is always a place on the encyclopedia where you can contribute. All the best. TimothyJosephWood 22:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yammy XOX edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yammy XOX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hirsutism (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yammy XOX edit

 

The article Yammy XOX has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tornado chaser (talk) 23:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I already feel really offended. I put an external link that goes to the YouTube channel of Yammy XOX.

Article moves edit

Immediately stop moving articles - You need to go to the talkpages and seek consensus!, –Davey2010Talk 00:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

To put it in a less harsh way... just because one YouTuber's article doesn't use their pseudonym is not a reason to move all other articles that do. If you really wish to change the article titles, then please follow the processes outlined at WP:RM since these page moves are clearly controversial. Thank you. SkyWarrior 01:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Then move Dan Middleton to DanTDM. Larsconks (talk) 08:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jake Paul, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Eggishorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Markus Persson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Hey Larsconks. Glad to see you're sticking around. Just FYI, but when someone leaves you a message here, you can usually post a response if you're at all confused about their comment, and they'll usually try to explain it better. You may also want to check out our tutorial on referencing, since I see you're updating a lot of stuff, but not always including a reference for where the information came from. Content on articles needs to include these references so that the information can be verified by readers, and so if there is a change, people can check the sources and tell which version is the correct one. If you have any questions feel free to follow up on my talk page and I'd be happy to try to help. TimothyJosephWood 15:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Seán McLoughlin.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yammy XOX edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yammy XOX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "Ruby Rube" edit

 

Ruby Rube, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 13:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "Ruby Rube" edit

 

Ruby Rube, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 14:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varhess, New Jarso (July 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   15:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question edit

  Hello, Larsconks! I'm Jcc. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varhess, New Jarso (July 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varhess, New Jarso (July 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Works (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- TheMagnificentist 13:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Billy Zizzly (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 14:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varhess, New Jarso (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 14:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Return of the Mist (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jake Paul. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey, buddy. Let me tell ya something, I'm not vandalising, you are. And how? Because you revert good edits for no reason whatsoever. Larsconks (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jake Paul. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Look here, buddy! I'm not doing anything wrong, you are! So stop even trying to do this harsh stuff!

Okay, but in a less harsh way, I would please like you to stop doing this to us. It's bad for you and us.

Oh, and BTW, Jake Paul was truly born on January 17, 1997. Watch his Draw My Life video from the beginning to the end, it's true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whOlQ9Z4Iz4 Larsconks (talk) 17:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • A web site that lists Wikipedia as one of its sources is never acceptable to use as a reference. Please review WP:RS very carefully before making any more edits such as the ones you made at Matthew (given name). RivertorchFIREWATER 17:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I didn't even use Wikipedia for a source, I used Names.org. Larsconks (talk) 17:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Exactly. Names.org lists Wikipedia as one of their sources. Don't use them as a reference, OK? RivertorchFIREWATER 17:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

[SIGH] Alright. >:( Larsconks (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:EthanGamerTV edit

 

A tag has been placed on Draft:EthanGamerTV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7: article does not establish notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: EthanGamerTV (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 10:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varhess, New Jarso (August 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 11:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2017 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Larsconks (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18944 was submitted on Aug 08, 2017 21:08:51. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Team 10 (YouTube) edit

Hello Larsconks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Team 10 (YouTube) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 00:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ferapy (August 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyle McCarson (August 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RileyBugz会話投稿記録 23:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Help Me Help You (song) edit

In future, please do not add featured acts to the disambiguator in an article title. We don't credit featured acts in article titles on Wikipedia, especially not with "ft." as this is simply shorthand and we would spell it out. Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (music) and check out the names of some featured articles for songs: you will see featured acts are not credited in their titles. This is unnecessary disambiguation as well; there is no other song with the title "Help Me Help You" on WP, so the move was unnecessary. Thanks. Ss112 00:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boothworld Industries (August 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Investment edit

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.


 

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!


Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 11:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyle McCarson (August 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
97198 (talk) 07:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 428 North Delsea Drive (August 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Lake Day Camp (August 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Lake Day Camp (August 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 09:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Lake Day Camp (September 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 22:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruby Rube (September 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 16:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruby Rube (September 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 22:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyin' Ryan (September 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lyin' Ryan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lyin' Ryan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Lake Day Camp (September 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Liberty Lake Day Camp edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Liberty Lake Day Camp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Lerdwichagul (September 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Works (September 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Lerdwichagul (September 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 01:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dylan Loumeau (September 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Wumbolo (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Lerdwichagul (September 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dylan Loumeau (September 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scare PewDiePie edit

How many times do I have say it, it's an American series. It's not a British/English or Swedish series, it wasn't produced by a company with these nationalities nor was filmed in these countries. Just because PewDiePie isn't American it doesn't automatically means that Scare PewDiePie isn't an American series. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Okay, well, now, I know. Just not too harsh next time, okay? Larsconks (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of List of DanTDM Creates a Big Scene episodes edit

Hello Larsconks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of DanTDM Creates a Big Scene episodes for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, DanTDM Creates a Big Scene.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Phil (talk) 01:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ella Anderson. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Also please don't add as an edit summary a charge of vandalism towards another editor unless it really it vandalism per WP:Vandalism. Per WP:BLPSOURCE removing unreferenced or poorly referenced bio info is not vandalism. If the issue is about the reliability of a given source then either discuss it on the article talk page or raise the issue at WP:RSN (search archives first). Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Dan Schneider (TV producer).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. The recent spate of redirects have no relationship to the redirected page  Velella  Velella Talk   13:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Fong edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jason Fong, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Serina Mawer edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Serina Mawer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of David L. Peters edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as David L. Peters, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dustin Alvino edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dustin Alvino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dustin Alvino (October 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kid in a Candy Store (song) edit

 

The article Kid in a Candy Store (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Investigation at SPI edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Larsconks. Thank you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Boothworld Industries listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boothworld Industries. Since you had some involvement with the Boothworld Industries redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 20:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some bubble tea for you! edit

  Thank you for helping to make Wikipedia a better place. C3lluloid (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Homer Groening listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Homer Groening. Since you had some involvement with the Homer Groening redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. � (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

"666-666-6666" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 666-666-6666. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 14#666-666-6666 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply