Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Lapastillaroja. You have new messages at David FLXD's talk page.
Message added 20:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

David_FLXD (Talk) 20:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Roosh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

David_FLXD (Talk) 21:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fixing reward

edit
 
Hello Lapastillaroja, Star767 has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Star767 (talk) 20:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Care to Try?

edit

Hi ... I saw your edits and wanted to introduce myself. I have no affiliation with Roosh V, but out of pure interest I created stub articles on a variety of topics in the effort to document the fascinating sub-culture that is the manosphere. I have more references and other material but gave up in the face of repeated campaigns by biased editors. Perhaps you'll be more lucky than I if you care to try.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Female_solipsism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Beta_Provider http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Marriage_Strike http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/White_Knight http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rationalization_Hamster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sexual_Market_Value http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cock_Carousel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Manosphere

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dalrock http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/GirlWritesWhat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Barbarossa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Roissy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/W.F._Price — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethicalv (talkcontribs) 09:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply