Landry76

Welcome!

Hello, Landry76! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! RexxS (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Mount Vernon

Unfortunately, I've felt obliged to revert your last edit to the Mount Vernon article because much of your contribution was a word-for-word copy of the text in "Travel Washington, DC: Travel Guide Illustrated with Maps and Photographs", which I must suppose to be a copyright work. Please take time to read Wikipedia:Copy-paste which is intended to give simple guidance on how to write for Wikipedia without violating other people's copyright, or unintentionally committing plagiarism (which is passing off another's work as your own). In its simplest terms if I can find a phrase like "came into possession of the land from which Mount Vernon plantation would be carved" in both your text and the source, then you're paraphrasing too closely to claim that you're writing in your own words.

As some of the organisational changes you made are clearly worth looking at (e.g. moving the Washington's Tomb section to a subsection of grounds), I'd suggest you start a discussion on Talk:Mount Vernon to garner some other opinions and seek to make changes in small chunks, getting feedback at each stage - too many changes in a single edit makes it very difficult for other interested editors to discuss what you are trying to do. --RexxS (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi RexxS! Thank you for the warm welcome and comments above. Point taken! How odd my contributions would be so close to the text you mentioned since I have not read it. I guess I should be a travel guide writer! :) I do want to point out that the phrase you mentioned above was not my contribution and can still be found in the reverted article. I'm assuming my detailing of the rooms is what was so close to the text you mentioned?

You're right, I was too bold in my revisions and need to start off small. Thank you for taking the time to explain the process and keep me on the straight and narrow. I guess I do need to be adopted! -- Landry76 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Howdy Landry76; another talkpage-stalker chiming in with an additional welcome here (I modified your reply to RexxS with some colons -- most folks are touchy about other people modifying their comments but in this case I wanted to show you how the formatting works so I made an exception). Please call me 74, nice to meet you. I ran across you on Giano's user-talkpage.

  You are always free to be bold, that is doing it exactly right. If somebody wants to 'complain' about your changes, they will revert your changes, which seems rude at first, but you'll find it is the norm, fortunately or unfortunately. Just take it in stride. All that it means, is they want you to take the subject to the article-talkpage, and bring it up there, so everybody who is interested in the article-topic, can work together on the ideas. There is actually a nice overview of the typical workflow-process here at WP:BRD, which stands for Bold/Revert/Discuss.

  For something oh-so-controversial like adding infoboxen to an article... which is a surprisingly bitter "religious" issue on wikipedia... no way for you to know that of course but don't worry you'll get the hang of navigating the wikiCulture... usually I will instead follow Discuss/Revert/DiscussEvenMore.  :-)   This goes double for high-traffic articles like Mount Vernon, which millions of readers see. Anyhoo, Giano and RexxS are top-notch folks, you will learn a lot from them. I also recommend the WP:TEAHOUSE for fast answers to quick questions. Feel free to drop in on my user-talkpage anytime, as well, if you get stuck or need a hand with something. See you around, and thanks much for improving wikipedia.

  p.s. As for the carved-from-a-plantation-thing, that happens from time to time. Give WP:TONE a read-through, it will help if you keep your language WP:NPOV and carefully bland... wikipedia is about conveying facts, and although good prose is a part of that, picturesque turns of phrase are best avoided... partly because, many of them that seem original when we write them out, prolly are cliches we dimly remember. For instance, the very phrase "picturesque turns of phase are best avoided" ... which I wrote just now myself... is almost certainly on the internet somewhere already!  :-)   Hope this helps. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 00:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Landry76, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Landry76! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you please add Palazzo di Amore to List of largest houses in the United States?

Can you please add Palazzo di Amore to List of largest houses in the United States? --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Reply - @Jax 0677: Sorry for the delay in getting back with you. I have not added Palazzo di Amore previously as it is a compound, and according to the tax records the main house is "only" 28,122 sf. --Landry76 (talk)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Earl of Mar may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Landry76. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Landry76. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Landry76. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)