Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Information icon Hello, Lamgo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, User: Deb. Thank you for your guidance. But it was disappointing to know that the page I created was deleted. I have no link with the pages created and I had created pages with what interest I have. The content of the page you have deleted was the one I had written after spending a lot of time reading the guideline of how to write the content. I hadn't written anything promotional. All the things were about the company and its services which every company on Wikipedia enlists. Also, all the sources were reliable from third-party media outlets. If it was promotional in tone, it could be improved, the deletion was not the solution. Thank you Lamgo (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I understand and I am prepared to move the article into Draft space for you to work on if you don't have a copy. Unfortunately, the wording sounded exactly like an advert, and, with your history of very few edits, any articles you create will be subject to intense scrutiny, and it would be far better for you to start with minor amendments to existing articles until you are more experienced. I would recommend that you create any new articles in draft and submit them for review. Deb (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello User: Deb! Thank you. I'll improve the article in the draft. Lamgo (talk) 09:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David A. Chase (November 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 07:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lamgo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 07:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • @Doc James and GSS: This account is most likely Apifara based on checkuser log comparison. Also, the accounts, Melchizedek123 and Joanna Jiang need to be looked at more closely. The former is   Technically indistinguishable to Lamgo with some timing skew and the latter is a UA match on a similar IP.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply