Lahore to Karachi
To leave us a message click here.
Other links
editMarch 2016
edit
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia talk:File Upload Wizard with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:File Upload Wizard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Malcolmxl5, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SMALLJIM 20:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SMALLJIM 21:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Lahore to Karachi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please unblock us, we didn't do anything wrong! Lahore to Karachi (talk) 06:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Firstly, yes you did. Secondly, Wikipedia does not allow joint accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lahore to Karachi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Come on! This user understands what they did wrong, and will not do it again. Lahore to Karachi (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Despite both of you claiming otherwise, both of you still don't understand that accounts are supposed to be owned by a single person and that sockpuppetry is unacceptable. Max Semenik (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Which one of you is it that understands? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Both of us! Lahore to Karachi (talk) (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Lahore to Karachi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Come on, unblock us now, we now understand that accounts can only be owned by a single person, and we will not do it again. Lahore to Karachi (talk) (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access revoked to stop this waste of time. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)