Laddypat

January 2008

I'm writing our response to Hoary's message on this page so I hope that is correct. We give you permission to show John's bio on the page or, if you want, you can edit it since it contains all factual information. We also provided a link to an article about John in the Washington Post, but, for some reason you deleted that also. You have other links to articles and you've referenced them, so I'm at a loss as to why you cut the Washington Post reference. The article is at http://www.readexpress.com/read_freeride/2007/10/tuesday_basedow_baring_it_all.php. In addition to that, we provided a paragrah that we originally wrote for your site, meaning it wasn't copied from any other website and is thus not in violation of any copyright regulations. That paragraph is below. You can feel free to verify any info provided in it. It's completely accurate and not biased in any way. You can delete the links if you want but I don't see any reason for not including this information in John's Wikipedia entry.

CORRECTED INFO: << John Basedow can be seen and heard throughout the media. He is a spokesperson for the American Heart Association and has led their annual Heart Walk for the past 2 years. You can see photos from this event on http://www.fitnessmadesimple.com/heartwalk.php. He also does charity work for the American Diabetes Association (see http://www.fitnessmadesimple.com/diabetes.php) and St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital (see http://www.fitnessmadesimple.com/st-jude.php). He spoke about the current childhood obesity epidemic and how to combat this problem at various events, including the Girl Scouts Health & Family Fun Expo (see http://www.fitnessmadesimple.com/gs.php). John's a successful author and his new book, Fitness Made Simple: The Power To Change Your Body & Life, which is published by literary powerhouse McGraw-Hill, is available in book stores everywhere. John is a regular guest on over 30 TV and radio shows nationwide every month. He was just contracted to be a national spokesmodel for Chamonix Nutraceuticals, a high end skincare company, and WeightView, a cutting edge computer technology company that helps to motivate people by giving them a visual image of what they'll look like when they achieve their fitness goals (see www.WeightView.com). In addition to all of this, an outside production company offered John his own reality series, John Basedow TV, which now appears on the internet (www.JohnBasedow.tv and www.MySpace.com/JohnBasedowTV) and he's doing Success Made Simple seminars with his good friend, Fran Capo, who's the Guiness Book of World Records' Fastest Talking Woman as well as a 9-time author and comedienne. See www.SuccessMadeSimpleSeminar.com. >>

We also fixed the MySpace site link, which you had incorrectly going to www.xxxxxx.com/OfficialFitnessMadeSimple. It should go to the MySpace site www.MySpace.com/OfficialFitnessMadeSimple.

Thanks for your help.

Kind Regards, Pat Riches FMS Operations

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Laddypat. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article John Basedow, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Widefox; talk 11:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to John Basedow does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Widefox; talk 06:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Basedow, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Widefox; talk 06:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at John Basedow. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widefox; talk 07:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Laddypat", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Here [1] you use the word "we" multiple times. Is this account used by one person or several? Do you have any connection with the subject? You have not declared an WP:COI, but it is clear (WP:PROMO / WP:SPA) that this account is for promotion only and you have incorrectly and aggressively challenged and removed other editor's maintenance and talk page comments - see WP:OWN. Widefox; talk 07:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at John Basedow. "Received email from Chris Wilson at Wikipedia saying page protection should be indefinite. Please add this back on as indicated in his email. Added Basedow's Vine channel as reference at bottom of page as well" your edit summary is misleading - you removed the maintenance tags again without giving a reason. Stop now or you will be blocked. Widefox; talk 08:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 09:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with John Basedow. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. The article is not owned by you, see WP:OWN. Also, do not remove the Article for deletion tags. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at John Basedow. (already given L4 final warning for this - now reporting user for edit warring) Widefox; talk 13:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Basedow. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Parsecboy (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Laddypat reported by User:Widefox (Result: ). Thank you. Widefox; talk 13:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Laddypat, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Widefox; talk 09:51, 10 May 2017 (UTC)