LJBazza

LJBazza (talk) 06:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

This user has publicly declared that she has a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Queensland Brain Institute.

LJBazza, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LJBazza! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Queensland Brain Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Queensland Brain Institute. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Queensland Brain Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Queensland Brain Institute. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queensland Brain Institute (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Queensland Brain Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 17:41, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queensland Brain Institute has been accepted

Queensland Brain Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Marshall (neuroscientist) has been accepted

Justin Marshall (neuroscientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bilby (talk) 08:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Justin Marshall (neuroscientist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Justin Marshall (neuroscientist), LJBazza!

Wikipedia editor Edaham just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for this great contribution. My only concern is that some of it reads a bit like a resume. In particular the awards section is a bit lengthy. My advice is to pick two or three of the most well-known awards and write some prose about the notable reasons for their being awarded to the subject, rather than just listing them indiscriminately. Apart from that the biography seems well sourced. Thank you once again. Edaham (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Edaham's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Koopman has been accepted

Peter Koopman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)