Welcome!

Hello, LHeyns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Glenwood Park, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenwood Park edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glenwood Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Explaining the deletion, given the permission? edit

I see a claim on the Glenwood Park talk page that permission has been given for the material to be used. However, we have to be a bit more formal, as anyone could write that. As noted in the message above, see Donating copyrighted materials for explicit instructions.--SPhilbrickT 15:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Clarifying how permission can be granted edit

I just left a message here with one of our top experts on copyright. She is usually quite prompt in responding, so I hope to get an answer soon. If she is not around, I will check with another expert.--SPhilbrickT 16:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

As I guessed, I got a prompt answer. One of our experts confirmed that the existing wording doesn't quite work. The good news is that she suggests the following wording:

The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

Note that this will address only the copyright issue (and some of our editors are zealous about addressing possible copyright violations, and might miss the wording. If a new article receives a deletion notice because they simply see the similar wording, let m know and I'll intervene.) What is does not address is the concern that the article, as written, appears to be "blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service...". That issue also needs to be addressed, and is often a difficult issue to address by someone close to the subject.--SPhilbrickT 17:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

If only all new neighborhoods focused on green building and sustainability. I'll approach this with more external sources. Thanks for your hawkish eye.

Speedy deletion edit

 

The page Glenwood Park, Atlanta has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply