{{NoACEMM}}

Use of secondary sources

edit

Using only PDC articles as the source would not meet the requirements for verifiability and notability. 2023 PDC Challenge Tour series and 2023 PDC Development Tour series are an example of articles that were deleted due to not having “enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG” and 2023 PDC Pro Tour is tagged as being too reliant on primary sources. If we want the articles to meet Wikipedia's guidelines, the use of reliable secondary sources such as the BBC and Sky ones for WS1 and WS2 is necessary. JamesVilla44 (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

One of the references (I tried to fix) but couldn't, was showing as an error, so I gave up trying to fix it. I just thought with so many of the same references, there didn't need to be that many. – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 20:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah the errors on PDC ref for PC3&PC4 were caused by them being unhidden before the reference was available. Should be all clear now. In your sandbox thing of course you can use any reference style or type you want, but on the main page itself you see why we have to make sure we’re not reliant on PDC.tv. The last thing we want is all our hard work going down the drain through a page deletion. Sky & BBC coverage of Women's series events is something are ones we should use when available given their reputation as reliable independent perennial sources. Reliance on PDC.tv is what caused the downfall of the two pages mentioned plus many others. JamesVilla44 (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do you know of any sources (other than darts oracle) for the prem darts page?... I tried looking but couldn't find anything. Only thing with D.O is that it shows incorrect information, and the only sources are from PDC itself, but that doesn't show full stats, 100+ 140+ etc... – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 01:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism and duplication

edit

I strongly request that you do not destroy the women's section of the Darts Pro Tour page and do not edit unnecessary things on the separate page, Thank you! Szpity88 (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

At what point am I vandalising by editing a page... I think you need to look again before accusing me. And HOW am I editing unnecessary stuff?... Seriously, every time I edit stuff on the darts pages, you immediately jump on my talk page and start harassing me... – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 16:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I looked back, your edit is completely pointless and vandalism. And on the separate women's page, it is unnecessary to publish the ranking again, the Pro Tour page contains everything. Szpity88 (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
ok, I didn't realise by adding the WMP table was unnecessary, so I do apologize for that. – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 16:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I honestly ask, why do you put the flags, for example, in the middle when you edit? We have been doing this everywhere for years. That was really all that was interesting, it ruined the site. Szpity88 (talk) 16:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
in the middle?... I don't... I just thought it looked better with the winner flag on the left side instead of the right. (For example)...   Beau Greaves instead of Beau Greaves  .. <<<-- if that's what you mean by middle?.. then no, that's not my edit, I edited it to the flags by the left of their names... – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I meant the right side and meant the middle of the table. Look at all these tables on the pro tour page and you will understand my question. Szpity88 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Secondly, we do not edit temporary ranking lists and results that have not yet happened. This is not Livescore. Szpity88 (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok I understand, I was only trying to add the updated table with Greaves and Ashtons match not finished yet. – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 16:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
sorry for the accusation, next time I'll ask first Szpity88 (talk) 17:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
before I create the womens matchplay page, I've put it up on my sandbox. There's only 1 reference so far, and that's just confirming the players. Shall I create it, or wait until closer to the start? – 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 L1amw90  (🗣️ talk to me  • ✍️ contribs) 19:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply