Welcome!

Hello Kyle sb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 


Sources for Greg Hall edit

Hello, good work on Greg Hall, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Greg Hall? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET for different citation methods. Thanks!  BRIAN0918  13:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tas electorates edit

Kyle, I hate to discourage your editing, but I have reverted your additions to the five Tasmanian federal electorate articles. The state electorates of the same names are different entities and should have separate articles. I suggest:

Regards Adam 10:46, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Kyle, I think the way you have done the Franklin article is excellent. I see by the way we have very similar interests (except perhaps river systems). Perhaps we should start Labor Wikipedians. Adam 12:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ivan_dean.jpg edit

Hello, thanks for uploading Image:Ivan_dean.jpg. Unfortunately images restricted to non-commercial use only are no longer permitted on Wikipedia. As a result, this image is likely to be deleted shortly. If you can find a better image which can be used for commercial purposes, please feel free to upload it to replace it. Thanks! --David Johnson [T|C] 19:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Dealing with vandalism edit

Thanks for spotting and reverting the vandalism on José de San Martín. This anonymous user in particular has commited vandalic acts in the past. In cases like this, if you have the time, leave a warning in the vandal's talk page (see Wikipedia:Vandalism for details). This serves to let him/her know how close s/he to being blocked, and for administrators to assess her/his behaviour at a glance. Cheers! --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I got to go sorry—Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.210.30 (talkcontribs) 17:49, 22 December 2005

Lin Thorp edit

I'm assuming that this edit was meant to refer to 2005 (or else I've mysteriously lost a few months!). Ambi 05:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, (thanks if you have changed it). I was just writing in another article "will face election in 2006". It was still on my brain. Time doesnt fly that fast... --Kyle sb 16:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Sir_John_William_Evans.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir_John_William_Evans.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Kyle edit

Greetings, I'm not a 100% sure, but I think the 3 you removed, from the Paul Hindenburg article, is referencing the quotes from the book at the very bottom of the article. How's the weather in Tasmania? Dr. Dan 20:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC) p.s. If I'm correct, will you replace it, or should I?Reply

Well I thought that (3) might reference something, like a quote. However I couldn't see any evidence of that and it wasn't in brackets, linked or anything. You can change it, if it's not supposed to be there. The weather in Tasmania is muggy and hot today, about 26 degrees:P. Kyle sb 07:12, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good Work edit

Well done on the 2006 Tassie election article. Maustrauser 11:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tasmanian Election edit

Kyle, I am not sure if this comment should just be added to my talk page, or duplicated on yours . . .

Regarding my recent edits to Tasmanian legislative election, 2006 I removed that statement 'The Liberals gained a 4.5% swing, despite making no real gains in the election' because the Liberals did make a "real gain" in the election - their primary vote increase. The amount of swing they got is specified elsewhere in the sentence "The Liberal primary vote rose by 4.5% to 32%." so it did not need to be stated twice. Also, speculation about them possibly picking up a seat (slim chance) could conflict with the "no real gain statement". Peter C Talk! 06:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Replied on user page

Kyle, your edits on this article are good. Keep up the good work. Peter C Talk! 10:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Map of Lyons edit

Looks fine to me. Are we going to hold our three seats in Franklin? Adam 07:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done. Ambi 23:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Opposition Leaders edit

It's a work in progress. I was about to run out of laptop battery, so I had to save then or I'd lose it. I'm just about finished the list now - I'll have it posted in a couple of minutes. Ambi 06:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done now. I just need to disambiguate the names and add a bit about the position. :) Ambi 06:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Block edit

I'm sorry Kyle; that was my understanding of blocking policy as well. If you can specify your IP I can unblock you. Unfortunately when an IP is blocked there can be collateral damage such as this; as it is meant to prevent an anon from circumventing the block by creating/editing from accounts. - RoyBoy 800 06:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Circumcision Userbox edit

You may find a userfied version of the deleted box in my user space at User:Tomyumgoong/ubx/nocirc, feel free to subst or transclude it if you wish. Tomyumgoong 07:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Titles in electorates edit

Hi,

Would you like to give feedback on the use of titles in electorates?

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics/Electorates#Titles in member lists

-- Newhoggy | Talk 04:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof! edit

Hi Kyle sb, thank you for your interest in VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're all set!

 
Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (this also places the user box attached) or, [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof|{{PAGENAME}}]] to your user page.

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen TC (Stollery) 13:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

My user page edit

Thanks for reverting that so fast! -- Steel 01:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

BIRTHDAYS! edit

Hi on ur user page u have a userbox that has ur birthday in it. how do u get a userbox with ya birthday in it? ps im from tassie to!

Image:Kyle sb political ideology.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kyle sb political ideology.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 15:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Saturday lottery ticket Tasmania.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saturday lottery ticket Tasmania.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 15:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:VandalProof icon.jpg edit

Hello, Kyle sb. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:VandalProof icon.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Kyle sb. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

June 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Connect Financial, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Thewinchester (talk) 17:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:CVU status edit

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request for comment edit

Hello. I am wondering if you'd like to contribute to this discussion to help in coming to a consensus, as I feel that this is an important thing to do before the federal election. Thanks! Frickeg 23:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:William_Cox_Governor.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:William_Cox_Governor.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 19:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Kyle sb! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 937 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Tania Rattray-Wagner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Thomas Chapman Tas.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Thomas Chapman Tas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Saturday lottery ticket Tasmania.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Saturday lottery ticket Tasmania.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Alocasurina stricta.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Derwent tas legislative council.PNG missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hobart meetup edit

Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hobart area articles edit

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fair Use in Australia discussion edit

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Proposed deletion of Noland Bay edit

 

The article Noland Bay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ElectroChip123 (talk) 02:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Pembroke tas legislative council.PNG edit

 

The file File:Pembroke tas legislative council.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Nelson tas legislative council.PNG edit

 

The file File:Nelson tas legislative council.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Wellington tas legislative council.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Sydney harbour small rectangle.JPG edit

 

The file File:Sydney harbour small rectangle.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Kyle sb political alignment.PNG edit

 

The file File:Kyle sb political alignment.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply