User talk:Kyle Peake/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kyle Peake. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Your GA nomination of Fortune (Chris Brown album)
The article Fortune (Chris Brown album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fortune (Chris Brown album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ojorojo -- Ojorojo (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
GA review
Hello,
A cuple of months ago, or so, a reviewer decided to open multiple GA review articles. He passed them withouth respecting guideles or giving us enough time to adress most of the comments and doubts we had. Nevertheless, I was thinking about some sort of exchange with you if you are interested, I would review your GA nomiantion of Yikes, no strings attached (if it fails, it fails if it is a pass it is one), if you could give a look and give me some pointers on a article he passed. I would very much appreciate your experience on "Finesse (song)". Nevertheless, I'm aware the article is GA status, but I strongly believe you could elevate the status of said articles as we are two experienced useres and our approch to said articles would be better and they would stay far from scrutinity or doubt. A discussion should be formed in the article talk page as some sort of second review. It will take some time, but section by section it will get easier. Please let me know if you are interested in something like this or not.
Kind regards, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- @MarioSoulTruthFan: Hello, good to hear from you once again. Your plan sounds great with lack of bias towards anyone, but I think "Finesse" should be submitted by you for a peer review in this process that I'll undertake, or maybe a GA Reassessment since even though it's highly likely to remain a GA, this will allow me to make comments and you to respond? Also, I'm all for you reviewing "Yikes"; I'll just give it one last read through first. Update: have done a read through and it's definitely ready! --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Great then! I believe that the GAN reassement is more suited in this case, however if you feel like a peer review is more suited let me know. I would go with the GAR as the peer review is to see if it is suited for GA or FA, it's a GA already. Nevertheless, if the former option is more likely you will have to follow the nomination for the individual reassement as I'm a major contributor to the article and I can't open one "Use the individual reassessment process if: You are not a major contributor to the article". See instructions here. Let me know what works best for you. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
@MarioSoulTruthFan: Done now, could you open the Yikes (song) review by any chance please? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done, I will get right to it! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Whenever you get the change, just start to adress the "Finesse (song)" article. Thanks. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @MarioSoulTruthFan: Yeah that is in my plans to happen over the weekend. --Kyle Peake (talk) 20:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Whenever you get the change, just start to adress the "Finesse (song)" article. Thanks. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yikes (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yikes (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yikes (song)
The article Yikes (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yikes (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yikes (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Outline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ye (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ye (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ye (album)
The article Ye (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ye (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yikes (song)
The article Yikes (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yikes (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Good Morning (Kanye West song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Good Morning (Kanye West song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Good Morning (Kanye West song)
The article Good Morning (Kanye West song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Good Morning (Kanye West song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 09:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
GAN Drive
Hello,
I noticed you have been reviewing a couple of articles. Have you tought about joining the GAN backlog drive for the rest of the month? Any reviews you made since April 1 will count. You can get barnstars as motivation.
Kinds regards, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- @MarioSoulTruthFan: I have joined now, did I submit myself properly though? --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- It seems like it. Good luck! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
@MarioSoulTruthFan: What are your thoughts on my involvement, do you believe I have been a worthy addition to the drive? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- There is no reason to think otherwise, you have been helping to recude the backlog, that's the goal. So don't stop! But I'm sure the coordinators can give a better feedback than me. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
MOS:SMALLTEXT, Infobox updates
Hello,
Thank you for GA-reviewing "Girls" for me. I've enjoying improving the article. I just wanted to drop you a note to say I hope you're not offended where I've not done some of the suggestions and responded back.
Additionally, I've noticed you have written quite a few good articles yourself. You don't appear to be aware that some recent consensuses have passed which have changed some established editing practise. Just wanted to bring to your attention:
- MOS:SMALLTEXT clearly states that small text should be used sparingly and most definitely not in an infobox where text is already smaller than the main body of an article.
- Template:Infobox song has been updated so that {{hlist}} is now built into the fields so you do not need to use the template anymore
- Template:Infobox song#Producer clearly says that the field is reserved for full producers, not executive, co. or additional producers. A consensus was established on this here.
Could I kindly ask that you are mindful of these during your own submissions and make any updates where they are necessary across articles you are editing? Thanks dude. :) → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 17:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Lil-unique1: Thanks a lot for this post on my page, I have made further comments on the GA review towards you and I understand your reasoning for points marked as Not done; I will have a look at my own articles sometime though like you said to see how I can fix them. --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Lil-unique1 There are changes that aren't marked as Not done that you haven't complied with yet, which is why the article is still On hold. It is very close to passing though and will be there once you have made those few fixes. --Kyle Peake (talk) 20:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I believe all of the points have now been addressed :) → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 21:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Lil-unique1 There are changes that aren't marked as Not done that you haven't complied with yet, which is why the article is still On hold. It is very close to passing though and will be there once you have made those few fixes. --Kyle Peake (talk) 20:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Follow God
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Follow God you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 06:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Follow God
The article Follow God you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Follow God for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 17:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Follow God
The article Follow God you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Follow God for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hot Pie
I know you have already earned a pie for promoting articles to GA status, but here's a second hot pie for the work you've put in reviewing other editor's nominations. It's extra effort that makes Wikipedia a better place for everyone. Know that your work in the Songs/Albums category is appreciated, and keep it up! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 14:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC) |
- Nice4What Thanks a lot, I'll add this to my user page! --Kyle Peake (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Lucid (Aṣa album)
Hi Kyle Peake,
I just saw an automated message on my talk page about the Lucid (Aṣa album) article failing the GA criteria. Are you done reviewing the article? I'm curious because you did not leave any comments at Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)/GA1. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 20:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Versace1608 I am unsure why that has come up, since I have not failed the article and no, my review is to come soon. However, looking at the history of music good article nominations, you can clearly see a glitch representing the album article twice for some reason; I am not sure what caused this but it is definitely of high relevance here. May be because of the "ṣ" letter coming through as odd to the bot? --Kyle Peake (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick reply. I am going to wait until you finish the review and will address any concerns you may have about the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 20:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi! I would like to thank you for all the feedback that you have put into the article Sas Plus/Sas Pussy. I’m thankful for the work you have voluntarily spent on the article. As you might have understood that I’m not a native English speaker so, your feedback has been a boost for my English vocabulary. I hope that you continue with your good work, and I wishing you good luck for a bright and prosperous future on WP. Regards Premeditated (talk) 08:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Every Hour for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Every Hour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Hour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cool Marc ✉ 08:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
GA review
Hi. I would be really grateful if you would consider reviewing "Black Swan (song)" that is a current Good Article nomination. I have a chain of examinations coming in soon, which might make it impossible for me to be regularly active and address all issues. Plus, this is my very first GA nomination so I am a bit anxious. Thank you for your time and consideration. --Ashleyyoursmile! 05:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ashleyyoursmile Sure, why not? I might take a bit of time to review since it's quite a large article, but this won't arise issues since not only is that expected in this case but you won't be regularly active anyway. Just be aware that I will do separate edits in the review with more suggestions, rather than instantly reviewing the entire large article. --Kyle Peake (talk) 05:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I will wait for your review. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ashleyyoursmile No problem, you can respond to any issues before I have finished. --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I will wait for your review. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Half Million Award
The Half Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Ye (album) (estimated annual readership: 500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
- Reidgreg Very proud of this, thanks so much and I'll put it on my user page when I've fixed some formatting issues. --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- If it takes up too much space, there's a userbox for it... {{User HMAward|Ye (album)}}
GA
I would like to personally thank you for reviewing When I Was Older and for helping me with the things I didn't understand. DarklyShadows (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- DarklyShadows It has been a pleasure, just take comments like those on board as guidance for editing in the future. --Kyle Peake (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
GA review
Hey. I don't know if you can do this, but I was wondering if you can review Everything I Wanted for GA? I love this song and wanted it to be GA for months, but I was unsuccessful in the past because of problems with other editors. You are the best and most helpful reviewer when it comes to making articles GA. You tell us what needs to be improved and what needs to be done. Thank you so much for all you have done. DarklyShadows (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- DarklyShadows It looks well-researched upon first glance, I will likely review this article sometime in the coming week period. --Kyle Peake (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I will be waiting! DarklyShadows (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)