Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kwentra

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Kwentra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JW 1961 Talk 12:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit
 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Girth Summit (blether) 13:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Block mistake

edit

Hello there,

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kwentra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock our page "Kwentra". We are new in Wikipedia, we had a plan to contribute to the hospitality industry so we just wanted to fill the missing fields which we did from our website content, we understand now that this was a mistake. It was an unintended mistake to post such content that we had no idea that it's against Wikipedia's policy, we used this content as a test to see if our newly created page is working or not, and it's not any kind of advertising at all. Thank you and looking forward to your feedback.

Decline reason:

Accounts are for individuals, not groups. Please designate a single person to exclusively operate this account and give no one else access. That person then needs to make an unblock request that simulatneously proposes a new username that represents them as an individual(their real name is not required); they need to use the first template in the block notice, not the second used here. Since you don't think that "Our unmatched experience, cutting-edge product line, and overarching passion for hospitality enable our mission." is advertising, when it clearly is, there are no grounds to remove the block. The operator of this account will need to read WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. If your only goal here is to tell the world about your business, this is the end of the road. If the operator of this account is interested in being a general contributor and making edits unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kwentra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi sir/mdm, I think there is a miss understanding, the only reason is to why we wrote "Our unmatched experience, cutting-edge product line" is because we wanted to test the page if it will work given that we had no experience in wiki pages before. This was not a marketing stunt by any means, we could have written bla bla bla to just see if the page is working as we had no experience so I do not think it is fair to block us given that we had no idea how it works. I really appreciate unblocking it and to have us under review, if we do not follow the guidelines that we now know, block us again, but give us a chance please.

Decline reason:

You have done none of the things requested by 331dot. Yamla (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kwentra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have ready what 331dot asked me to read but how can I remove what he/she/they wants me to remove if I do not have access? I would delete all of that and start from scratch

Decline reason:

Per below; you need to at least propose a new username. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still have not proposed a new username as instructed, and you have not demonstrated your understanding of the policies I described. We're not interested in having you edit about your organization at this time, so you will need to tell us what other topics you will edit about. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kwentra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

thank you for your feedback and patience - I will check with my CEO and come back with a proper setup, is that ok?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This is not an unblock request and in any case, we only accept unblock requests made after signing in to the account. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.