User talk:Kurykh/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Kurykh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - ... (up to 100) |
Template:Referendum box begin
Thank you for creating Template:Referendum box begin. I would have done so myself, that is if I thought to do so. :P – Zntrip 21:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Ralph Nader
In 2008 United States election Ralph Nader should be listed as Independent Party because he formed The Independent Party for his 2008 presidential campaign to gain easier ballot access in some states
AfD nomination of Perfect rhyme
An article that you have been involved in editing, Perfect rhyme, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect rhyme. Thank you. -- Atamachat 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Berg v. Obama
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Berg v. Obama. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ––bender235 (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Seating chart link
I struggled to find the link to the seating chart (I eventually found it in my browser history), and realized it should be linked from 40th Canadian Parliament, Canadian House of Commons, or the like. I'm not sur which makes the most sense, though; any thoughts? -Rrius (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for List of notable people who wore the bowler hat
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of notable people who wore the bowler hat. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Personal attacks
As per your comment here, I would recommend that you acknowledge that personal attacks are attacking the person (i.e. "you are stupid") and not their actions (i.e. "extremely troubling conduct"). As such, your comments are 100% opposite of Wikipedia policy and improperly inflammatory. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but if you honestly think that is a personal attack, then I really don't have any confidence in your understanding of policies. Personal attacks are attacks on their person, saying that they are a bad candidate is not an attack on their person. It is an attack on their credentials. Now, if you really believe in your interpretation, you can take this up at AN/I. However, right now, your insinuations to me violating policy does not belong at the voting page. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- There is no apology necessary. Your disagreement with my view is perfectly acceptable. However, I do not want it to be used in order to justify claims of incivility, which is a blockable offense and can cause far too much drama. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. check my block log. Maybe it will explain some things. Note the "legal threat" bit causing quite a controversy and subsequent attempts by pro-blocking me for "legal threat" groups trying to rewrite the NLT page resulting in an additional "edit warring" block against me (only three edits on that page, all trying to keep the page from being changed while discussion was still taking place on the talk page). Great times, especially when the reviewers of the blocks and the only supporters happen to be her regular associates and not neutral admin. Am I bitter? Sure. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 776313eae3b00e94039dc126718b6d04
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 99ce8364974a1e2a2a334be83e58e203
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
List of Forgotten Realms characters
Hello.
I'm trying to build List of Forgotten Realms characters as a proper character list. Could you please restore the edit history of Ellifain Tuuserail and Gareth Dragonsbane for me, and redirect them to the list so that we can merge the content in? Thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 05:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
DavidWS (contribs) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy holidays! DavidWS (contribs) 19:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Love Systems
Hi Kurykh I was working on a "company page" and I wanted to make sure Wikipedia several admins would approve the page. Whenever you have time, could you give me some pointers on how to improve the page? The page has to go through a DRV before it can get back up. Any feedback is much appreciated!
The page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coaster7/Love_Systems
Thanks in advance. Coaster7 (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
SFBAProject template
Hi. Would you kindly address the issues I mention at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area/Assessment and Template talk:SFBAProject, or else unprotect the template so other editors and I can do so? Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
List of fictional governments DRV
Don't you think this deserved a bit more of an explanation than just "deletion endorsed"? DHowell (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
How about changing "Member name" to "Member type"?—Markles 23:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion review for Nick_Savoy
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nick_Savoy. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Coaster7 (talk) 02:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Middle East campaign
As the original author of the Middle East campaign who as recently as October 2008 was in favour of keeping this article (talk:Middle East campaign#Fictious?). As I was not informed of this AfD, I would appreciate it if you would either reconsider your option. I am not in favour of either deletion or merger. --PBS (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- BTW a quick Google of books ["Middle East campaign" Persia ]would show that this is not just a descriptive name see for example:
- Democracy and War By David L. Rousseau p. 223
- A Short History of the Middle East By George E. Kirk p. 199
- William Slim, commander of the Indian 10th Division certianly looked on it as one campaign. "We had scrambled thought skirmishes of the Iraq rebellion, been blooded, but not too deeply, against the French in Syria, and enjoyed the unrestrainedly the opéra bouffe of the invasion of Persia. We had bought our beer in Haifa and drunk it on the shores of the Caspian. We could move, we could fight, and we had begun to build up that most valuable of all assets a tradition of success. We had a good soldierly conceit of ourselves. Now in March 1942, in spite of dust storms....it was stimulating to be in what we all felt was a critical spot, waiting for the threatened German invasion of Turkey."
- --PBS (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Must have been told (as it is in the history) but for some reason did not see it on the page. However the section in the Middle East Theatre of World War II#Middle East Campaign is in summary form with Middle East campaign and a detailed article to the summary, as one usually does in such cases. If I had taken part in that debate as I am doing now there would not have been a consensus to merge. It is debatable if there was anyway, and there is even less of a consensus now that I am engaged in the debate. So what to do? By the way the version in the other theatre article is a cut and past from the Middle East campaign article. Which I intend to turn into a summary. --PBS (talk) 22:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- You can see my response to the above on the ME Campaign talk page, where it was also posted.
- Since last summer there has been 4 major, including this last discussion, efforts to improve this area of the wiki. Two have been conducted under democratic votes and the above user keeps coming in following the conclusion of these debates/actions and then fights tooth and nail to halt any improvement being made and even attempted to revert months of work done in one case.
- I simply reject the premise that with his presence the vote would have gone differently, I tend to believe that the community is smart enough to look at material and have the ability to make an informed decision. With that said the community has already done so (twice!)…--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Epitomics Article
I'm new to wiki. I'd like to create new articles about technology our company created. I started with an article about our company - Epitomics, explaining the name with the short description of the company. This article was deleted in couple of seconds. Can you please let me know what did we do wrong? --User:Epitomics 14:02, 11 January 2009 (PST)
Protection of King Arthur
The article is being vandalized on a very regular basis, the request for protection was made not because it was a Featured Article... but because it is being heavily vandalized. Today nearly all of the last 50 edits have either been vandalism or reverts of vandalism. Do you think you could semi-protect the article briefly? I can't revert the vandalism fast enough. Icemotoboy (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of N-able
I am fairly new to Wiki, so I apologize in advance, but I have been trying to build an N-able page. My goal is to provide some history into this organization, talk a little bit out its products. I am not trying to sell anything, or even promote anyone to going to the company website, I am simply trying to give users a common definition for this organization. The first time I posted this article, I made a critical error in that I set-up my user name as the title of the article (and for that, I apologize). I tried reposting, but was told that it was "blatant advertising". I took out as much of the offending text as possible, but now it is permanently deleted because I have tried to post several times. Is there anything I can do to fix this article? My ultimate goal is to help define the term Managed services and help provide some information as to the founding organization that have shaped this new business and social phenomenon.
Thanking you in advance Johnny calhoun (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
A deletion?
Hello. I'm not sure if this is the correct place to be posting this, but I wrote an article about the company that employs me, VideoAge International. It was deleted a day after it was written, because it was "Advertising" or something like that. Could you please explain to me what I did wrong?
Post by Serafiny —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serafiny (talk • contribs) 02:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the new supervisor articles, but I think you might have mistakenly added some categories as well as the Lifetime template from David Campos. In other words, Avalos is not gay, unless he's married to a man named Karen.[1]--Larrybob (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I originally planned to create this list but didn't. I am glad to see you create it. In my opinion, the above list looks good and FL-worthy. But ref 2 at a glance is probably not a reliable source. Anyway, cheers —Chris! ct 01:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
Briggs Initiative
Thanks so much for adding the detailed numerical results, including the map, to Briggs Initiative. [2] Where did you get the information? I've looked myself and not been able to find it online. It would be an even greater contribution to the article if you included a source. - Enuja (talk) 10:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the speedy deletion of the Dubstep FM article
I believe that this article was not a candidate for speedy deletion for the reason that it was a completely legitimate and factual article with the information stated. I specifically had permission from the owner of Dubstep FM (dopelabs) to create the article. Also, this article had sufficient enough information to be considered at least a stub. Also, If you would more information, please contact me on my talk page. NAXDON (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
File:ClausAndHans.jpg
Pictures that I have of this band (Bonfire) and continually being deleted even though they are freely available on the band's website for fans. Since that happens I had decided to use a picture that was available from one of the band's albums and I asked how that would be classified and was told it would be like a CD cover so I applied that. Why did you delete this picture for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonfire34 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
I have raised a request for arbitration re: NatalieDee article merged with Married to the Sea See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration-- Spastic on elastic (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
|
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Kurykh/Archive 13, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Discussion moved from VPR
In order to save readers from the pain of our bickering, I've moved our discussion to User talk:Equazcion. Please respond there, if you feel compelled to continue. Thanks. Equazcion •✗/C • 06:47, 14 Feb 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
DRV
- Pier Solar and the Great Architects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that somebody is questioning the deletion of this article at DRV, here, though apparently under the mistaken impression that Stifle performed the close. S/he placed the deletion review notice on Stifle's talk page rather than yours, so I thought I'd give you the heads up. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Still looking for a source on the Briggs Initative Data
I see you've uploaded a new version of File:CANov1978Prop6.png. Where did you get the numerical data you used to make the image and the table in Briggs Initiative? - Enuja (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
— 16 March 2009- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity, are you planning to bring Muni Metro to GA status?—Chris! ct 02:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
: 23 March 2009
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
: 30 March 2009
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Total Access Statistics
I would like clarification for why you endorsed the deletion of Total Access Statistics page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_23
I never received a response after providing information showing it was relevant (cited in signficant scientific journals), reviewed by 3rd party books and publications, and an established product that's been around for 12 years. It's much more signficant than many other products that are published on this page Comparison_of_statistical_packages. It doesn't seem like a careful review of the page was performed in the rush to delete it. Please advise either what was wrong with the submisson or what additional support you need to confirm this is worthy of being in Wikipedia. The listing was descriptive and not commercial. Your feedback is appreciated. DataAnalyzer (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
AN
I've responded to your comment at AN, FWIW. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, alright. Thanks for the reply. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:05, 4 April 2009 (UTC)