KulaHub Ltd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Ben Teggin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Request reason:
As previously explained the "article" was posted as a test, i have never posted to Wikipedia before hand and so had no idea how to use the editor, the text in the article was copied from the website and we didn't intend for it to stay there regardless of the block, as ive said, it was merely there as i couldn't think of any dummy text to test. Today it was going to be changed to explain the history of KulHub, who founded it etc. I am sorry if its come across as showing nothing but contemt for what Wikipedia is but it was not intended to stay there and now i fully understand what can and can't be posted i will look into putting together a new article that fits the guidelines and rules of Wikipedia. However to do this i'll have to create a new account if this one is not unblocked..
Decline reason:
See below. MER-C 09:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- You were not blocked because of the content of the article. The article was deleted because of its contents. You were blocked because we do not allow an editor to have a username that implies it belongs to a company. Each and every Wikipedia account is intended for use by one individual. John from Idegon (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Wrong -- this user is also blocked because of the contents of that "article". It shows nothing but contempt for what Wikipedia is. Unblocking cannot be considered until this user demonstrates understanding of the purpose of Wikipedia. MER-C 09:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)