Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Chisamba (August 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kuda.ndebvudzemene! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Mudiwa Hood, without good reason. Your move of Mudiwa Hood to the mainspace was premature. It's still in the AFC process and your move left a lot of comments and templates that are part of AFC in place on the main article. Feel free to learn more about WP:AFC and participate in the project that way, but the article should remain as a Draft until that process is complete. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia Carter (Tcr25). I have just rediscovered my account and relearning to contribute to the platform. After also making editions on the article Mudiwa Hood, such as removing irrelevant information and making it more concise and precise in regards to the genre I had hoped to make it my first published article. I respectfully disagree with your assertion but the article has good reason to exist given how it is about a noteworthy artist in the burgeoning Zimbabwean hip hop genre. All facts and statements made are corroborated with verifiable media sources that are prominent in Zimbabwe.--Kuda.ndebvudzemene (talk) 16:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kuda.ndebvudzemene, I agree that Mudiwa Hood appears to meet notability criteria for inclusion; it's just that the article is in a process for acceptance and moving it from Draft to the mainspace without completing that process is not proper protocol. By all means, continue to make sure the information is top-notch and well citing and it should be moved over smoothly. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of SIRDC

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SIRDC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Htanaungg (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rebecca Chisamba

edit

  Hello, Kuda.ndebvudzemene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rebecca Chisamba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Rebecca Chisamba

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Rebecca Chisamba, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply