User talk:Kubura/Archive13

Prince Philip

Please stop adding Andrew to Prince Philip's name at the Croatian wiki. He is not called Andrew. Nor should you be using rollback to undo good faith edits. DrKiernan (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please, post me hr.wiki-related messages on hr.wiki, not here. It's pure luck that I've visited en.wiki. Kubura (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bernice Carr Vukovich

The article Bernice Carr Vukovich has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Croatian–Ottoman Wars

The article Croatian–Ottoman Wars has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.AndreaFox ^{Knock here...} 16:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franjo Vlasic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. I have included in this nomination the article Kubura (currency).

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles. JohnCD (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fadil Muriqi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

Xhevdet Muriqi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Serbian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaime Lopresti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universidad Catolica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elizabeth of Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Hedwig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Tesla

Hi Kubura

Tesla's nationality, ethnicity, birth country and citizenship have been debated at length on the article talk page. If you have better sources than the article current uses, please present them at so that a new consensus can be reached. I have removed the category Croatian Inventions from List of Nikola Tesla patents. Most of his inventions were made while a US citizen. More importantly, a list of patents does not belong in Category:Croatian inventions. - MrX 03:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

My answer on MrX's page. [1] Kubura (talk) 03:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Croatian help needed!

Hello Kubura, I'm contacting you because we need some Croatian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Croatian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Warning

This warning comes somewhat late after the fact, but given your long prior history of disruption I believe it is still relevant and necessary. I just happened to notice that back in June you did this: [2]. This shows you are still following your tendentious agendas in the same way as when you were topic-banned some years ago. If I see anything like this from you again, you will be topic-banned permanently, without any further warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

RE: Široka Kula massacre

First of all, Kubura, stop accusing people who disagree with you or question you of being "ignorant".

"Hanging of suspected United Irishmen." -- what the heck does this mean and what has it to do with the issue of war crimes by Croats and Serbs?

"All Croatian court decisions are valid worldwide." -- um, no!! Not every country recognises another country's jurisprudence, particularly if the country whose jurisprudence is not a recognized state, is regarded by the United Nations or other such organizations. Do most countries recognize whatever legal system exists in countries like Iran or North Korea or Equitorial Guinea? (I am not comparing Croatia to those countries, by the way, just so you know.) Did American and Irish rebels recognize British jurisprudence? Did the Boers in South Africa? Do fundamentalists of whatever religion always recognize civil laws?

Thirdly and most importantly -- the issue of Serbs and Croats (or Serbians and Croatians, whichever you prefer) -- is one which is taken to heart with great intensity amongst the international diaspora, in ethnic and religious terms. One can almost guess the identity of a writer based on how and what he/she writes, what statistics he/she relies upon, how he/she posits his/her thoughts and/or ideology.

For example, if I were to say I genuinely believe that the mostly-unatoned Ustashe war crimes of WWII have played an enormous role in shaping the contemporary Serb mentality, you can guess that most likely I am not Croatian, or I am perhaps an iconoclast, like Milan Levar (rest his soul), although not as brave, or Slavenka Drakulic (who decamped to Sweden), but they are fairly few and far between. If I say that Split nationalists behave like Nazis, you know where I generally stand. In short, what I am trying to say is that it is obvious, Kubura, on which side of the aisle you belong, like certain other editors, so you are considered by those who are not aligned with you to be perhaps overtly POV-pushing. (I must admit that Joy is remarkably even-handed.) There are also pro-Serb editors on Wikipedia, but not as organized or masterful at apologetics as the pro-Croat side, it seems. Even American television shows, such as NCIS, NCIS Los Angeles and ER (this last likely thanks to Goran Visnjic, whose first film role was as a neo-Ustase (see IMDb), who served in the war himself in real life, and whose real-life father-in-law (Antun Vrdoljak) is a bureaucratic neo-Ustashe in my opinion), engage in massive anti-Serb propaganda. Serbs are not angels but they are not demons either. Quis separabit? 19:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion proposal

Croatian–Ottoman Wars has been tagged for deletion. Please have your say. Thanks. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

20-20 Vision - Izazov iz Walesa

Swansea Football Club and [3]

Puno hvala za dodavanje podataka na izazov! Međutim, možemo samo dodati krpelja u tablici, ako informacije je dodan od 24. svibnja. Stvarno mi je žao da nije bilo jasno. I sada sam dodao sentance iznad stola. Minimalna tekst potrebno: 2.000 bajtova teksta. Hvala - i, još jednom - Ispričavam se zbog ne tako da je jasno.

Ako možete dodavati 1.000 bajtova, onda ću biti sretan, i moje srce će pjevati iz ovdje u Hrvatsku! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kubura. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Croatian Wikipedia

S vašom odlukom na hrvatskoj Wikipediji ([4]) se ne mogu složiti jer ovo nema ikakve veze sa zdravim razumom, ponajviše neutralnim i objektivnim moderiranjem, dapače, ovo je potpuni debakl da ne jedan već dva administratora hrvatske Wikipedije ne znaju niti razumiju pravilnik uređivanja Wikipedije. Ovo u višegodišnjem uređivanju engleske Wikipedije nisam doživio. Ovo je za anale i biti će primjer da podijelim s engleskim administratorima kao primjer neodgovornog uređivanja i moderiranja na "stranim" Wikipedijama.

1) Netočno ignoriranje konteksta. Prema pravilu WP:VERIFY svaka činjenica mora biti potkrijepljena izvorom, a u vezi te rečenice (u kojoj su sporna dva linka tj. poveznice na dva grada) je bila citirana knjiga bez broja stranice, kasnije se referirajući na str. 62-63, koji opet, kao i sam izvor općenito (knjiga), uopće ne podržavaju te dvije poveznice.

2) Netočno. Ukoliko urednik nije spososan parafrazirati citirano iz izvora onda je to nesposobnost i trebao bi se informirati kako to propisno učiniti, a ne biti isprika da drugi trebaju provjeravati i popravljati njihovu nesposobnost (You may not simply brush it off and assume someone else will come and fix the issue) ili kako se samim tim treba opravdavati kršenje autorskih prava. Štoviše, urednika Ceha sam upozorio kako to propisno učiniti (npr. staviti u navodnike), ali je svejedno nastavio revertirati jedno te isti tekst. Prema pravilu WP:NFC te izjavi administratora na engl. Wikipediji u potpunosti ste pogriješili jer "content that violates any copyrights is deleted. The person removing a copyright violation is under no obligation to re-write the content". Ono što je još apsurdnije, Vi kako i urednik Ceha ignorirate da je taj tekst već bio sumiran u prethodnom paragrafu što je dovodilo do nepotrebnog dupliranja jedno te istih zaključaka. Ovo su ozbiljni propusti i kršenje za koje odbacujući stav poput vašega nije ikako prihvatljiv i ne smije se tolerirati.

3) Netočno. Išao sam po proceduri. Ja nemam obvezu ikome davati naznake, pogotovo ne urednicima koji imaju više od 10 godina iskustva, za određene osnove koje se podrazumijevaju da se znaju, ali ovakav nekvalitetan nivo uređivanja i nepoštovanje pravilnika koje je pokazao urednik Ceha ne može se uopće opravdavati iskustvom. Prema pravilu WP:BRD ukoliko je vaše uređenje (karte/dodane informacije) bilo revertirano vi ste dužni započeti razgovor o istome, a onaj koji revertira (moje dodane informacije) navesti razlog brisanja istih (nije učinjeno), potom ne započeti uređivački rat vraćanjem uređenja (karte/dodane informacije) ignorirajući razgovor. Upravo to je urednik Ceha učinio, a vi namjerno to ne želite priznati. Dapače, s obzirom da sam vidio kako imam posla s urednikom koji nema pojma niti o pravilnom uređivanju niti o proceduri morao sam učiniti njegov posao i započeti razgovor. Niti to vama nije dovoljno da priznate već kritizirate što sam to učinio tek nakon što sam otišao spavati, probudio se i to učinio na stanci tokom posla.

Nakon svega dovoljno ste drski da se usuđujete izjavljivati kako sam "masakrirao" članak iako sam ga doveo iz ove inačice u ovu inačicu, a također nasjedanjem na izjave "svoga" urednika (Ceha) vi mi također insinuirate negativne namjere i cenzuriranje što je potpuna glupost i nema ikakve veze s realnošću čime osobno kršite WP:GOODFAITH.

Ono što je najveća sramota je u činjenici da sam ja, koji je uređivao, pozivao i upozoravao prema pravilniku, dobio žuti karton, a potom i crveni karton s blokadom od 3 dana, dok urednik Ceha koji je upravo svjesno učinio sve ove prekršaje pravilnika uređivanja Wikipedije, ne da nije dobio niti upozorenje, već na "slobodi" iako mu je tri puta bilo objašnjeno da se ne mogu uvrstiti poveznice u članak jer krše WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY i WP:OR nije u stanju ([5]) poštovati i prihvatiti iste već i dalje pokušava izigrati sustav uređivanja Wikipedije.

Toliko o tome koliko ste odgovorni i sposobni da izvršavate funkciju administratora. Može vas biti sram. Ukoliko me u roku od 24 sata ne odblokirate, a na članku maknete zaštitu i vratite ga u zadnju inačicu, u suprotnom ću ondje započeti WP:RFDA. Ugodan dan.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Čestitam, dobiti ćete RFDA.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 00:46, 30 October 2017 (UTC)