Krisitor

Welcome!

Hi Krisitor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! /wiae /tlk 12:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rovca into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 12:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

My bad, I wasn't aware of that rule... My goal was to merge the two pages into Rovčani, which I ended up doing, but I didn't know I had to reference the previous page regarding the content I moved, sorry for that. Krisitor (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Krisitor, no problem, this is one of those rules that isn't so well publicized. I've done the attribution here this time so there's nothing else you need to do on Rovčani attribution-wise. Thanks! /wiae /tlk 13:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maleševci (tribe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maleševo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Mirilovići

I have noticed you deleted the adjective *Serbian village Mirilovići. According to 2013 census Serbian people live in the Mirilovići village, hence, Serbian village. Serbian people speak Serbian language, they are the Southern Slavs, Orthodox Christians. They have nothing in common with Romanian tribe Vlachs. (Unless, you want to emphasize that Serbs and *Vlachs are the same people, and that's derogatory in Bosnia and Herzegovina). Lavalooma (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Lavalooma, I did not delete anything in this article, unlike you. Please do not delete sourced content and if you disagree with a change, discuss it on the article's talk page. As for the content you deleted, that the village got its name from a slavicized Vlach tribe in the Late Middle Ages or Early modern period does not contradict the fact that it is today a Serbian village. Krisitor (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kriči, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Fixed. Krisitor (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

RS

You cannot remove or tag publications which are by definition WP:RS. If you want to remove them, you need to use WP:RSN. You can't remove or tag them based on your personal opinion. Maleschreiber (talk) 09:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

She's not WP:RS in this topic, as me and others have explained on the tp. Besides, what I reverted in the lead does not concern this source. Krisitor (talk) 09:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Durraz0 (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm not engaged in edit-war, you're perfectly aware of it because you are the edit-warring one, and a well known member of a tag team. Krisitor (talk) 12:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I have made one revert in 24 hours, you have made 4 [1]. I am not edit warring nor am I a "member of a tag team". this is a baseless accusation. It could be viewed as a WP:PERSONALATTACK and sanctioned. Durraz0 (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, my bad, I didn't count my last partial revert as a revert, but it was. Krisitor (talk) 14:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Sorry to intervene but Durraz0's part of disruption is much more severe: drive-by reverts without talkpage participation & wrong edit summaries as an excuse in various articles (simply to support the reverting firepower of a small team of editors with the same national interests as stated in a ANI). This pattern is seen in various Balkan related articles.Alexikoua (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your intervention @Alexikoua. Actually, I'm quite aware of the tag team and was pointed out to the ANI by another editor, months ago. Their pattern is so obvious that even new contributors notice it almost immediately, but as the admins didn't really react to the ANI, there's not much to be done about it. Krisitor (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Krisitor, Alexikoua thinks that by casting WP:ASPERSIONs against well established editors, he is being constructive but this is the exact opposite of a constructive attitude. Accusing well-established editors just because they agree on a few subjects even though they disagree about many other things is never a good idea. It's probably why all such accusations by Alexikoua end up in WP:BOOMERANG. I should note that Alexikoua has already been blocked for two weeks in 2023 and if he keeps up posting such comments, we can further discuss his response in WP:AE. Durraz0 (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Who are the "well established editors?" Simply making wp:BRD breaches and increasing a small team's revert firepower doesn't make you one especially without participating in the relevant discussions. Well that's indeed something that needs to be addressed in AE.

Let me provide you also a neutral picture about my contribution: I had this one block; the only one after a decade of endless contribution. I'm also part of the DYK Hof with 70+ contributions, main contributor in A-class, creator of 150+ articles in Balkan-related topics. Also, various editors including Albanian ones were straight to recognize my invaluable contribution in wp:Albania. As such don't hesitate to ask for any assistance about related topics. Alexikoua (talk) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

How did you end up here? AlexBachmann (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tribes of Montenegro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Katun and Czech.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Kj1595 (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)