Krass08
Krass08, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Krass08! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
Vandalism; possible conflict of interest edit
You can't just delete everything that is footnoted properly, just because you don't like it. As you did here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shana_Madoff&action=history
If you do it again, you may well be blocked.
Plus, do you have a conflict of interest? Is that how you took that picture of Shana Madoff, that you posted?
199.102.168.8 (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Re: == Vandalism; possible conflict of interest ==
Hello, as you must have noticed, I did not delete everything and in fact had left many of the footnotes. The problem with the previous page was that it had inaccuracies concerning the hard facts, such as the birth date, birth place etc. In an attempt to rectify the dates and names I also realised that much of the text was based on speculations despite the sources, such as Madoff's 'untimely' involvement with Eric Swanson. It was (and now is again) as such not a neutral portrayal of the person presented but leaves no doubt as to what the editor (you?) believes is the 'truth' concerning Shana Swanson's involvement in the scandal - in other words it is a biased presentation that that may also stem from a possible conflict of interest?! I suggest that the 'hard facts' be changed back to what I had entered. The rest may lie on the editor's conscience. In general I strongly feel that caution should be used when describing a person's private life and involvement in a matter so tremendous, especially when guilt has so far not been proven.