User talk:Kpjas/Archive-xx-xxxx-09-2006

witam i pozdrawiam;-) -- WojPob

email edit

My email kpj (at) gower dot pl, just in case.

Reply Concerning Poland Edit I love Wikipedia so I respectfully disagree. Out of respect for wikipedia, I will let the last revision stand.

Internet connection edit

Just a few words of explanation. To let you bear with me.
I have only dial-up connection to the internet and in this country it is rather costly. So I work in a kind of cycle : connect - read - disconnect - answer - connect - send articles and answers. I think this might explain my irregular activity on Wikipedia.

templates edit

Proposed templates for Wikipedia pages
Proposed keyword search mechanism
Application of the keyword mechanism
The importance of links
Metadata pattern
Wikipedia teamwork
meta:The future of Wikipedia


I use HiS and it works great and is very cheap (for a guy spending 10-17 hours on the net :). It can be cheaper if you network with 3-4 friends (my neighbor does this and it works great). The only limitation - HiS does not reach everywhere. -- User:Piotr Wozniak


This is, unfortunately, true in my case. :((
Thanks anyway for your suggestion, Piotr.
--User:Kpjas


Hi there Krzysztof. I too have been thinking about metadata as a way to enhance the Wikipedia. See WikiProject Concepts. --User:Seb


Tomek, pomoz nam przetlumaczyc hasla dla polskiej Wikipedii. Ze stron 'basic topic' 'complete list of encyclopedia articles'. To chyba da sie zrobic automatycznie.

No wlasnie, ze raczej sie nie da, bo nie ma odpowiednich slownikow, a przynajmniej ja nic o nich nie wiem. User:Taw


Hello Krzysztof, could you possibly look through chemotherapy, lung cancer and stem cell if you are not busy, although I know what crazy hours GPs, at least in England, get. I did these to try and prepare for my medicine university interviews, but they are likely to contain errors so just give me areas that I have got incorrect and I'll try and re-do them. Thanks -- sodium

Your comments on lung cancer are much appreciated. I'll read up some more on lung cancer and cancer in general to try and address your points. However obviously I can't write from anywhere near a professional perspective, and there is no way that I would be able to gain access to, or understand, medical journals. Not having this kind of understanding, I guess, is a problem if I try to write about medicine-related topics. -- sodium
Don't feel discouraged ! We can work out fine medical articles together, I'm sure. Mind I am not an native English speaker and I'm bold enough to write articles for Wikipedia.
Thanks and beware--I'll still keep trying ;-) -- sodium (In fact you won't have to start really worrying until my exams are over, towards the end of January)

Czolem Krzysztofie, dopiero zaczynam dzialalnosc, a mam bardzo niewiele wolnego czasu, ale oczywiscie z przyjemnoscia przylacze sie do polskiej Wikipedii w najblizszej przyszlosci. Doskonala i pozyteczna zabawa. Moja specjalnosc to jezykoznawstwo (fonologia, historia jezykow, odmiany angielskiego w czasie i przestrzeni). Pozdrawiam!
User:Piotr Gasiorowski


Przyjacielu! Ja równiez jestem zwolennikiem polskiej pisowni, ale juz mi zwracano uwage, ze na Wikipedii obowiazuje alfabet angielski. O ile w nazwach niemieckich mozna zastepowac ö przez oe, ü przez ue, w nazwach polskich trzymanie sie tych regul jest bez sensu. A propos! Ile lat moze miec ta Niemra, czy to jeszcze przedwojenna? Trzymaj sie! spacecadet123@prodigy.net User:Space Cadet


Hi Krzysztof --

Just wanted to say I'd hold off on the hostkingdom stuff -- I looked at some of it, and it's got a lot of errors. It's not that it's completely wrong -- it's just not right!JHK


I have someting for you on my talk page. --mav


Re Grotnik/Grotniki: Battle of Grotnik is the correct English usage. As I understand it Grotniki is a Polish genitive. Since the genitive is implicit in the English word "of" we would use the objective case which for all practical purposes in English is the same as the nominative. Eclecticology

In this case it is nominative - the location is called Grotniki, which is plural (quite common for Polish locations). AdSR

I don't follow what you meant but whatever. Ive just been working on some page cuz some guy earlier was writing this rant about how anyone that disagrees with Israel was a nazi-so i had to replace it with something. In the end, its probably useful to get discussion of actual groups involved with the conflict onto a seperate page. Lir 13:16 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC)

OK. IMO "Anti-Israel Movements" is implying something general and rather vague. Organizations themselves are : Hamas, Jihad etc and they have their pages. So under heading Organizations I'd list them rather then "Anti-Israeli Movements".
Kpjas 2002-11-10

Ta for the throbbing gristle corrections! quercus robur 11:29 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC)


Kpjsa, could you explain a bit on terms for anatomical location what the difference between frontal and sagittal is, if there is any? Thanks, AxelBoldt 03:45 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC)


Why did you return the disclaimer to Chlorpromazine? There are a number of reasons it should not be there - the article is not offering medical advice; piecemeal disclaimers are unsatisfactory - have you added a similar disclaimer to every medical article?; There is a central disclaimer already in place, whether people read it or not. Mav has already "slapped my hand" about putting in individual disclaimers.


Hi Kpjas, you may have noticed that I am heavily rewriting the medicine article. Many entries have been moved to more specific articles to make the medicine thing more readable. It is still somewhat messy, but getting more readable; you might like to look at individual articles, perhaps further additions should go there rather than to the medicine article. Kind regards, Kosebamse 16:39 Apr 12, 2003 (UTC)


Hello Kpjas! Are you aware that your edits are corrupting occurances of the Swedish letter "å" and replacing them with "aa"? This does not only make words unintelligible but also breaks established links to other articles. The most recent example is probably the Swedish Anthem. Earlier examples include Carl Gustaf Mannerheim and Astrid Lindgren. There has been discussion about this on Wikipedia:Village pump. -- Mic 18:08 20 May 2003 (UTC)

Same happened to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion, with a lot of different letters, such as "æ" -> "ae", "à" -> "`a", and things like that. كسيپ Cyp 16:29 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Hi Kpjas

Seems you are the one who redirected my new babe Knowledge technologies to Knowledge management. I started a discussion about the difference. You are welcome to jump in and explain :) universimmedia

Oops - saw your answer - wrong reading of page history ... apologies universimmedia


O.K., sorry, I am somewhat new here and still need some help. Please let me know if I have to add the text of the stub above or below the article's text. Thanks.-- The Warlock 07:58 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)


No more problem, just by accident I found the solution in another article. Thanks again.-- The Warlock 08:17 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)


Hi; strange beginning, happy ending, if you thought I got offended; not at all. I always think another person might have more information about those small definitions, as it happened to me with some articles, stubs or not; I think some of us prefer to write a little definition that can help others to know something about the subject than nothing, but it always can be completed. Thanks. P.S: I don't know you, but I am Aquarius :-) The Warlock 08:38 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)


That looks right... Using a different browser? كسيپ Cyp 17:41 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Nope. The same old Lynx. Just copied with it from the User: page here and looks OK.
Kpjas 17:49 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)

We need a clear statement of how multiple language and textbook links work. We really need easy cross-linkings. Please add to cookbook since many new users will read only that page. I think in time we will have to move to "food.wikipedia.org" to support unique features like unit conversion, en:moral purchasing tags, etc. Maybe we should propose doing that right now, to have "pl.food.wikipedia.org" and "en.food.wikipedia.org". Eventually make it "wikook" or something distinctive.

Yes. I see your point. There's no reason for Wikipedia not to have Polish, German or Czech cookbooks. The other thing is whether they should be written from scratch or be translated from the master English language version.
I don't know about the subdomains, though. For me it would be quite acceptable that books will be in the textbook.wikipedia.org. Whether split into podreczniki.wikipedia.org, handbuecher.wikipedia.org is still open for debate.
--Kpjas 19:28 11 Jul 2003 (UTC)

copyright infringement edit

Hello. I see that you removed the notice about possible copyright infringement from the Tanzanite article. Wikipedia:Copyrights is, admittedly, a bit vague on what to do with possible copyright infringements, but what most people do is remove the dodgy text from the article altogether, and replace it with the relevant notice from the Wikipedia:Boilerplate text page. See 1992 Summer Paralympics for an example. -- Oliver P. 22:17 15 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Spanish Wikibook edit

Hi and thanks for your suggesting for the Spanish Wikibook. I think we can just add 'software downloads' as one category within the Web resources page. -- Thomas


Fonzy edit

Hi Kpjas, Fonzy thinks that you (IP address 213.253.40.183) have startet the article Wikipedia:Wiktionary. Can you confirm (see User_talk:Fonzy/Sysop_request_for_Wikiquote)? Thanks, Fantasy 07:57, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. Even if my feelings tell me, that Fonzy can be trusted, I am still not 100% sure...

Thanks for suggesting "medical prescription" instead of "prescription (medical)". I don't have an opinion one way or another; you're welcome to rename the article. Note that Wikipedia at one time was suppose to abbreviate "prescription (medical)" in links to just the word without the parentheses: "prescription (medical)", but I don't think that's working. BTW, I'm not a medical professional so please do edit and correct the prescription article. Samw 03:38, 25 Aug 2003 (UTC)


Sorry I removed your pic from Grasshopper. I tried leaving it there but it looked a bit strange because it's a little blurry, not in close-up and the larger version isn't actually any larger.
If you disagree just revert.
Best Wishes,
Adrian Pingstone 17:38, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)


Hi Krzysztof. Please could you have a look at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/foreign language and see if there is anything that can be done about the Polish entry on there. As you are the Polish ambassador I thought you might want to copy it over to the Polish Wikipedia. If not, can you let me know so it can be deleted. Thanks. Angela 22:52, Sep 21, 2003 (UTC)


Hello Krzysztof: you've noted that the diabetes mellitus is "not up to the standard of scientific knowledge". Can you tell me any areas where you feel that the article is particularly lacking or incorrect, or suggest any corrections? -- Karada 22:42, 23 Sep 2003 (UTC)


Thank you, it was precisely that kind of comments I wished!--Ruhrjung 08:16, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Czastka elementarna edit

Krzysztof,

I've found a page, Czastka elementarna that, as best as I can tell, is written in the Polish language. Could you take a look at it and see if it's something to move to the Polish Wikipedia? I'm listing it on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/foreign language for now.

Thanks, Anthropos 01:49, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hi, I've called a vote at Talk:Silesia to try to resolve disputes there. I'd appreciate your input. Thanks! john 23:01, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I fear you're right. Although I think that really the problem is about one user, Caius2ga. Nico can be abrasive, but he's willing to compromise and discuss things, for the most part. Part of the idea of a vote is to come to some consensus so that if users continue to mess about, we can have some definitive statement that would allow us to prevent it from happening... john 01:39, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

You wrote: For me someone who contributes hundreds of articles that are NPOV and factually correct is not a vandal. Caius2ga is in my opinion such user. You can perceive his behaviour as annoying and perhaps disruptive. But I am sure that a compromise is possible. Alienating Polish users (Caius2ga, taw, Szopen, me) won't do any good. I wonder what is the opinion of Jimbo about all this.
Krzysztof, I wonder, why you fear, that anyone could want to alienate Polish users. I agree that Caius2ga cannot be classified as a vandal. While his contributions are mostly useful, our friend Nico is a typical monothematic contributor, and I've always been skeptical towards those having only one topic and writing nothing else. On the other hand I wonder, or moreover, I am completely bewildered, why Caius2ga and Wik never reply to a question, never try to help finding a consense. This makes mediation so difficult: If a contributor like Taw comes in and says, I will always revert, there is nothing to discuss, what can a mediator do? I was helpless, Kosebamse was helpless, and John is helpless now. If an arbitrator ends up with a mainly pro-German version (what I don't hope), one could not claim, that it wouldn't be at least partially the fault of people like Caius2ga and Taw. -- Baldhur 15:22, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hey, re:Upper Silesia, I think you're probably right. I think the best thing to do at the moment is just take out the whole thing about Opole being the historic capital (as I explained at the talk page), since it's not currently the capital. That information can be reinstated if someone wants to write about the history. (BTW, would "formerly Oppeln" be more or less offensive than "German Oppeln" as marginal criteria?). As far as the main Silesia article goes, and caius2ga, I suppose I've probably been too quick to accuse him of vandalism. I would say, however, that his behavior on that talk page has been utterly out of line. He repeatedly engaged in nonsense designed to make my attempted vote less visible, and added nonsense questions. He also tried to vandalize Nico's user page, and has frequently accused people of being Nazi apologists. I agree that he's made many useful contributions to other articles, but I think his behavior on this particular dispute has been simply unconscionable. I've probably acted badly on that page too - in particular, I've been too quick to anger, and I've shot off my mouth too quickly and been demonstrated to be wrong, but I think Caius2ga's behavior has been on a completely different level of obnoxiousness from anybody else's. In any event, I've become too emotionally invested in the whole mess. At this point, I just hope that a reasonable decent article can be worked out. I'm going to try to withdraw from active discussion until others work something out. john 05:40, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hi Krzysztof, what do you think how we should proceed on the Silesia talk page. I noticed, that there has been little traffic in the last days. The current version of the article is obviously not accepted, and we do not have another version. I would be pleased, if you could give your feedback on Talk:Silesia (above the "Silesia (moderated) always has the consensus version" line). Or, if you want to e-mail me, you may do so: my address is mt AT mirko HYPHEN thiessen DOT de. A similar message goes to Space Cadet, Szopen, Nico and Matusz. -- Baldhur 17:32, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Radio mast edit

Do you know if there is a (hopefully fuller) article about the Warsaw mast on the Polish wikipedia? -- Finlay McWalter 23:53, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I'd certainly put more stead in the polish pages you found than in the (very patchy) english language pages about the mast. Go for it. -- Finlay McWalter 00:05, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:53, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Medicine edit

Hello, pleased to find another doctor on Wikipedia. I'm trying to rally support for a more concentrated effort (including pretty blue boxes etc.) for the Wikipedia medical pages. Please see User:Jfdwolff/WikiDoc for some preliminary information. I saw you were previously involved in the Wikiproject on medical conditions. JFW 11:03, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind talk page message. I'll see if I can come up with anything substantial on the perceived readership. Please check on the WIKIDOC page in a while to see if you can manage to agree with my proposal. Are there any fields you'd like to commit yourself to? (You mentioned endocrinology and cardiology somewhere else...) JFW 19:14, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. As you might have seen, I've addressed the "readership level" on the WIKIDOC page. The way I see it now, nobody would be doing large amounts of work on their own (unless they want to!) Rather, it means: working basically along similar guidelines, using identifiable jargon terms and having some layout conventions. JFW 20:53, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

A message over the WikiDoc network—
User:Ksheka is trying to move [[Heart attack]] to Myocardial infarction. This involves having the Redirect deleted at Myocardial infarction. Please vote for delete at: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion#April_18.
JFW | T@lk 11:01, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Is WikiDoc moving? edit

Please follow this link for some information.
JFW | T@lk 12:31, 3 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Can you please translate the election notice * into Polish and post it prominently on the Recent Changes page of the Polish Wikipedia. Once you have done that, please let me know, and leave me a link where I can find it. Thanks. User:Danny on en.



Just a quick thanks for helping with that stub on Reni Jusis - I started tidying up what looked like cut and paste from a promotional website only to run up against a language barrier in find and verifying facts. - TB 20:35, 8 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Prescriptions edit

Hello. Can I encourage you to have a look at Talk:Medical_prescription and give a view on where info on British prescriptions should be documented: Medical_prescription or prescription_drug? Thanks. --bodnotbod 15:19, May 8, 2004 (UTC)

edit

Hello Kpjas,

There is an English banner message that suddenly appeared all over the place... Can you please translate it into Polish on pl: ?

Text for translation:

To help support Wikipedia, please visit 
<a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/fundraising">the 
fundraising page</a>, or read about <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/What_we_use_the_money_for">what
we use the money for</a>.

Location of the banner-msg template: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki%3AFundraising_notice

See the similar note I left Slawojar: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_Wikipedysty%3ASlawojar#Banner_translation

Thank you kindly. +sj+ 09:16, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Kpjasie, na stronie User:Halibutt/Warsaw Uprising pracujemy nad nową wersją artykułu o Powstaniu. Planujemy się wyrobić przed pierwszym, tak by nowy artykuł mógł się załapać na feature na stronie głównej. Czy mógłbyś nam pomóc i zająć się jedną z sekcji? Poza tym, czy wiesz kogo jeszcze z "naszych" moglibyśmy zaprząc do roboty? Halibutt 21:20, Jul 26, 2004 (UTC)

Do wzięcia są wszystkie rozdziały poza pierwszym i listą nazwisk. W zasadzie każda pomoc jest potrzebna, ale jeśli boisz się sknocić, to też się robota znajdzie. Na przykład tabelka z ofiarami po obu stronach, albo linki poboczne (warszawskie dzielnice - mam tabelkę {{Warsaw}} i zestaw mapek, tłumaczenia artykułów o ludziach z polskiej wiki - choćby :pl:Antoni Chruściel).
Jest też zadanie nieco poważniejsze - wymaga dostępu do jakiejś publikacji o powstaniu i do skanera. Numer polega na tym, że w większości książek opublikowano wiele zdjęć z adnotacją "autor nieznany". W Kirchmayerze takich zdjęć jest większość. Skoro autor jest nieznany i zdjęcia powstały 60 lat temu, myślę że można się pokusić o ich wskanowanie i użycie na zasadzie fair use. Alternatywą byłoby znalezienie jakichś zdjęć w sieci i spytanie autora strony o możliwość ich użycia. Wreszcie, na koniec przyda się dogłębna korekta tych naszych wypocin i dogadanie się z jakimś administratorem w sprawie zlinkowania artykułu na stronie głównej jako featured article.
Cokolwiek wybierzesz - będzie świetnie. Dzięki za odzew! Halibutt 22:57, Jul 26, 2004 (UTC)
Zamieściłem to zdjątko. Może udałoby Ci się znaleźć więcej takich perełek? Aha, spóźnione życzenia imieninowe (jeśli jesteś z tych obchodzących w lipcu a nie w grudniu). Halibutt 09:49, Jul 28, 2004 (UTC)
Krzysztofie, czy mógłbyś przygotować w wolnej chwili notki o Pełczyńskim i Chruścielu? Wystarczyły by ogryzki na podstawie naszej wiki... Halibutt 17:22, Jul 30, 2004 (UTC)


Illustrations in other languages edit

You are right in pointing out the importance of non-language-dependent illustrations. I've always tried to keep that in mind when illustrating (for example, my recent pics for Enigma machine are labelled with numbers only). If there are any of my diagrams that you would like text-less versions of, let me know and I'll gladly supply them. -- Wapcaplet 17:25, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

EasyTimeline edit

Kpjas, EasyTimeline has been made UTF-8 aware recently. 2 caveats: only extended ASCII range accented characters are recognized so far, and a few of those, e.g. è ñ are missing from the internal font used by Ploticus (which does the rendering). Complete unicode support will come once external fonts support has been added. This will take some time (months), as I am pretty busy with other Wikipedia work right now. Cheers, Erik Zachte 22:42, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

PP Wieczorkiewicz edit

Tak, tekst w swoim czasie wywołał burzę w szklance wody bo zaiste walczy z kilkoma mitami. Sporo tez zawartych w tym artykule znalazło się też w książeczce tegoż autora pod tytułem, bodajże, Wrzesień 1939 (mam ją, kupiłem z przeceny na straganie za jakieś 3 złote..).

W generałach Wojny Obronnej siedzę od jakiegoś czasu i (niestety) muszę się z kilkoma tezami zgodzić. Przede wszystkim z odbrązowionym wizerunkiem naszych dezerterów - w tym Rómmla. Oczywiście, Wieczorkiewicz popełnia bardzo wiele uproszczeń, zwłaszcza jeśli chodzi o ocenę strategiczną całej wojny. Traktowanie przez niego słów Hitlera za miarodajne źródło informacji jest nawet zabawne. Do tego w kilku miejscach Wieczorkiewicz popełnia straszne anachronizmy sugerując na przykład że zasługą Kleeberga jest to, że nie doprowadził swych oficerów do Katynia (o czym nie mógł wiedzieć i co raczej motywem jego postępowania być nie mogło).

Niemniej jednak sporo z tego co pisze trzyma się kupy. Jeśli interesuje Cię rozwinięcie jakiejś z jego myśli albo jakieś wytłumaczenie kwestii niejasnej - chętnie odpowiem. [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 01:28, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)

Nie jest to ani mainstream ani rewizjonizm. Trudno go oceniać w takich kategoriach, bo zwyczajnie jest to pierwszy tekst traktujący o tym zagadnieniu od niepamiętnych czasów. Bodaj ostatnim takim tekstem była... Wojna Polska Moczulskiego jakieś 30 lat temu. Na pewno można wstawiać nie tyle opinie, co fakty na które się PP Wieczorkiewicz powołuje, a to dlatego, że do tej pory zazwyczaj je skwapliwie pomijano, choć nigdy tajemnicą nie były. Ale nie sądzę, by notki o generałach zyskały na dodaniu do nich informacji, że ten to a ten był kolejnym legionowym generałem który nie dorósł do pokładanych w nim nadziei. Historyk może sobie na takie sądy pozwolić, encyklopedysta raczej nie.
Na pewno jednak tekst należy traktować poważnie i nawet opinie nadają się świetnie, gdy jakiejś notce brakuje drugiej nogi i trzeba znaleźć nazwisko do podpisania nim opinii. Wieczorkiewicz nie jest Daenikenem polskiej historii, można się spokojnie nań powoływać. [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 23:23, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for Glauber article edit

You may ( or not) be interested to know that I've just 'found' and added an edition of J. Glauber's to Library of Sir Thomas Browne. Apparently Browne's son Edward visited him in his old age also. Am always interested in fellow wiki's work on medicine, so thanks for doing the short piece in July. Keep a'wikiing ! 17:04, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

New translations! edit

Greetings Kpjas,

There are two new translation efforts this week which may interest you: a Wikimedia newsletter, and a global press release. Please help translate when you have time, and provide feedback on the major pl: wikiprojects (in the newsletter, under out of the projects). See m:Translation requests for details.

Cheers, +sj+ 03:58, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Ok, leaving updates on your meta-talk page, to keep everything in one place. (:

Geografia Polski edit

Perhaps you might be interested in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Polish Voivodships. [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 19:04, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)

Cover translations edit

See m:Translation requests/NL-1/Covers :) And enjoy! We will be live this week after a brief announcement.

+sj+

Volubilis edit

Hi Krzysztof, I would like to apologize for the way my fellow wikipedians reacted to your request on nl.wikipedia to translate the Volubilis article. When I read this, I planned to do the translation, but I saw that you allready did it yourself.. Maybe next time I can help, I already put myself on the available translators list. Kind regards, MarcoVD 20:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Mapy edit

Tak, znam je od jakiegoś czasu bo przewijały się przez różne wiki. kiedyś nawet próbowałem na ich podstawie przygotować coś swojego i nieco bardziej kolorowego, ale trochę to przerosło moje możliwości (za dużo polowania na piksele). Na pewno się przydadzą z braku laku, ale w wolnej chwili będę musiał przygotować jakąś dla nich alternatywę, choćby równie paskudną co ta na Royal Prussia :) [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 01:19, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing edit

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 19:11, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Main namespace cleanup edit

Heya, I've moved Krzysztof P. Jasiutowicz/Metadata pattern talk to User:Kpjas/old-Metadata pattern talk. There's some edit history, so perhaps you want to keep it. Otherwise just delete it (or ask an admin to do so). &0xfeff;--fvw* 20:16, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)


Thanks for uploading the image

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 01:10, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Also, Image:Zamek krzyzacki w Malborku.jpg. Thanks, – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 22:46, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Hiya

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AVillage_pump_%28miscellaneous%29#Retrospective

Anthere 05:58, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Question on old edit edit

Hi,

I noticed that in October 2003 (!!!) you added the datum that Ibn Nafis discovered the circulatory system in 1268 in the article circulatory system. However, this disagrees with the date of 1242 given in Ibn Nafis by a whopping 26 years! I looked online for a source to no avail; do you have a reference for the datum in question? I would like to fix whichever article is in need of fixing, but I can't do it without a reference and unfortunately I can't find one myself. (Internal inconsistencies drive me crazy!) Thanks for your help.

- Bryan is Bantman 23:10, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, your source is quite helpful. I will update the articles as required. - Bryan is Bantman 01:05, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin edit

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:16, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion warning The image Image:ZyklonB etykieta.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Invitation edit

Hi Krzysztof. Good to see that you are still active here. I don't know if you remember me, we had some mail contact about the Silesia article two or three years ago. Are you interested in a German-Polish meetup on the island of Uznam/Usedom? If so, add your name to this list: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Treffen_der_Wikipedianer_auf_Usedom/Spotkanie_Wikipedystów_na_Uznam. Take care -- Baldhur 9 July 2005

This article needs some attention from someone who not only speaks Polish but can describe the various dishes in English. I thought you might be able to help or would know someone who could. Rmhermen 15:57, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

How to.. edit

Masz w pelni racje :) Pozdrawiam--Witkacy 04:45, 10 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You showed support for Pneumonia, this week's Medicine Collaboration of the Week. You are invited to help improve it! — Knowledge Seeker 09:52, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Exercise hypertension edit

Hi! I left a note in Hypertension asking for an article on Exercise hypertension and giving four references. Could you help on one? Simesa 00:56, 27 August 2005 (UTC)Reply


I've opened up a first stub on this , with 'a Health Warning'!:-)80.177.213.144 aka linuxlad

Category edit

Added your userpage to category Physicians, hope you don't mind.--Nomen Nescio 09:43, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

edit

Hi: My name is Tess and I work for a global independent research firm in New York. I am interested in hiring you for a Wikipedia editing project, based on your technology and medical experience and expertise. I attempted to email you through your user page. If you received it, please read it over and contact me with any questions. If you did not receive this email, please let me know and I would be more than happy to tell you more about this project. (You can call 512-651-1797 or email tfurman@glgroup.com). Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon! Tess - Gerson Lehrman Group 19:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Visual Basic Classic Wikibook edit

I see you have contributed to the Visual Basic article on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic? --Kjwhitefoot 10:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


Emergency department edit

I wonder if you would consider supporting Emergency department at Wikipedia:Article improvement drive, to raise the profile of medicine on the wikipedia. The ED is a key area where the public receive emergency care, but the current article is very inadequate. Perhaps you can give some insight into the emergency department in Poland.--File Éireann 23:30, 10 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Img tags edit

Dzięki. Halibutt 11:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Babel edit

Could you consider adding this template to your userpage? It is very helpful in case translators are needed and such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Lasagna jonsullivan s.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lasagna jonsullivan s.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT 06:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Pizza jonsullivan.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pizza jonsullivan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhardT 06:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kpjas - Thanks for getting back to me about these! I've properly tagged Image:Pizza jonsullivan.jpg and I deleted Image:Lasagna jonsullivan s.jpg since there is already a larger version at Image:Lasagna jonsullivan.jpg. -SCEhardT 16:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

False Friends of the Slavist edit

Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:John_Cage_pl.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:John_Cage_pl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Santa_Maria_del_Fiore.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Santa_Maria_del_Fiore.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing edit

Thanks for fixing the dates. --VKokielov 12:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Basil 1511.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Basil 1511.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred-Chess 06:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks man. I moved the copyright info to the Commons page and deleted the local image. / Fred-Chess 07:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Six Sins of the Wikipedia edit

Nice read. Kotepho 23:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Helping people with static copies edit

I am generally happy helping people with anything if and when I have the time, was there anything specific you were after? --BozMo talk 09:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Still a bit lost on what you are after but when there is anything specific please shout

--BozMo talk 16:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please watch edit

Please watch amygdala. Thank you. Koalabyte 01:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Signpost Feature edit

I saw you thought my idea was good about gathering info from other languages. I can't speak every language in Wikipedia so I'm wondering could you do some? Treebark (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I will look over the report once it's finished and check spelling errors and other stuff. Were going to do one report on one language each week. This upcoming week, is going to be French. The following week will be Polish so Augast 7, or something like that who would be the Polish week. Please see User:Treebark/French Wikipedia report. Feel free to edit it. T®eebark (talk) 15:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the report from the Polish Wikipedia. We will need to do another language on Augast 7, just so you know I fixed the date so you can start thinking what language you want to do. I'm going to move it to a better location, and make some formatting changes. If you don't know what to do, I've written some languages at User:Treebark/Table though you can make up your own list or go in any order you want. Just see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-31/Interwiki report to make any other changes you want. Do the same thing you did; plan the article on your talkpage next week, I'll go and look at it, and I'll move it for publication or you can. Thanks. T®eebark (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Signpost edit

See: Report from the Polish Wikipedia (2006-07-31)

Re: Polish Wikipedia edit

Sure, I'll copyedit it. Would you mind overseeing the whole project by copyediting each week and alerting users who forget to write about the language? I told Ral315 that you and me would oversee all this. If you want to know who's writing you can find out at User:Treebark/Table along with the order. Every week after they've finished we'll go ahead and copyedit; fix stuff, and format etc. If a user is running late and I've yet to say anything go to WP:SIGN/N/O and put under "Interwiki Report"... This [[user|(put user's name here)]] is writing but is late this week. I have enformed him. And then you can copyedit it along with me. It goes live tommorow, Monday July 31. I saw your comment on Michael Snow's talkpage. This user will be publishing this week. I switched it around because I couldn't find someone to do the French Wikipedia and you had already started the Polish Wikipedia, by the time I started thinking about trying to get someone to write about the French Wikipedia. eebark t | c 17:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

The editor in chief said it was O.K to do this. You can decide what you want to do; I think I like your idea of how to write the report; as I won't be having Internet connection for 3 months or so. eebark t | c 22:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Kpjas, I noticed your comment on Treebark's talk page. You may be interested in Wikizine, a Wikimedia publication that serves all communities and is intended to serve all languages. The editor is Walter (en); I'm sure he would appreciate your help in either writing or translating news. If I remember correctly, his intent was to make Wikizine multi-lingual, but that process stopped because of a lack of translators. If you're interested, talk to him. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for putting together the report. Since we have it already, I figure it might as well go live with the July 31 issue rather than the August 7 issue. Ral315 will put the issue together, but it looks like he's okay with the concept too. --Michael Snow 01:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Would you mind putting down all the dates you would like to cover the Interwiki report, at User:Treebark/Table? Carmelapple 15:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just a note, I'm filling for Treebark- he won't have computer acsess for a couple weeks, so I'm sort of in charge. He emailed me to tell me last night; and said you were also in charge. Carmelapple 21:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just make sure each week is covered. I'll try to help; though I am very busy at the moment. Treebark should be back around Spetember 1. Carmelapple 21:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Carmelapple 21:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

French report edit

I'm working on it. Pyb 21:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your running a bit behind; you have about a day and half to correct it....Carmelapple 15:35, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Chinese edit

My Chinese isnt all that good. I added myself back when it was just starting up. -Ste|vertigo 21:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

French Wikipedia report done edit

Well, here shows the French Wikipedia report is coming along. I had actully planned (Since Pyb hadn't replied to me) to do a report of my own; so EyOne helped me; and I added some tidbits from him. Well it looks, like this is going well, I tried looking at the Recent changes on the Chinese Wikipedia yesterday, and as you can see from my contributions, the user Mikepanhu or something did not reply. I asked someone about the Swedish Wikipedia-they did reply and said no. Well, I'm off to see if I can get someone from the Chinese or Swedish Wikipedia. I've just asked Hux about a report for the Italian Wikipedia. Kind regards, Carmelapple 21:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Removing my old message; had no content expect for the people who I'm asking are not responding to me. Someone signed up to do the Chinese Wikipedia, so I gave them a few tips on there talk page, see User:Treebark/Table for more. Carmelapple 14:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I will. Note, I will be on vacation for August 28. I'm trying to get someone to do the Italian Wikipedia scheduled for that date; but you will have to copyedit it because I won't be here. I think that's the only week I'm going to miss, but I have to check my schedule. Would you like to help at WP:SIGN/N/O get news results and put them in "In the news" from Google results for Wikipedia, the link at the bottom? Carmelapple 15:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Catherine has been but she hasn't done in weeks. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-08-07/In the news for more. Michael Snow has done it, and we were so far behind subscribing to "In the news" this week, so I finished it for Michael. Carmelapple 15:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
O.K. Carmelapple 15:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Swedish Wikipedia report edit

Hi, I'm prepared to do a report about Swedish Wikipedia for the Signpost. There was a request about this on the Swedish Wikipedia Village pump. I'm bureaucrat at Swedish Wikipedia so I am not quite clueless about sv: wikipedia. Regards, Thuresson 14:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Signpost: Chinese Interwiki report edit

....Chinese Wikipedia report finished, at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-08-14/Interwiki report so outdated; because it was done last week, a week ahead of time. I have some really important infromation for you later to busy now to tell you. Carmelapple 15:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

August 28, and Spetember 4th edit

I will be unavabile, August 28, which is a Monday so I've got to tell you a few things to do with the signpost. I leave the August 23, and return Spetember 3rd. As the interwiki report is written on the weekend; I'll be able to help copyediting but not writing. I'll try and make sure those spots are filled before I leave. Anyways, I've been doing this. Once the report has been written go to the Wikipedia Signpost Newsroom and put next to interwiki which is the toppest most thing under regular features and put "In progress." When you've finished, put "Done" and the publishers will take it from there. I won't be able to help do anything for the August 28th issue. I should be writing the Spetember 11th report about Simple English though...BTW, as I said above the Chinese Wikipedia report is ready. Carmelapple 23:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes, and updating. It was prepared the day after the Polish Wikipedia report was published and made it to me the day before the French Wikipedia report was published. Do you think we should create a formatting page? When I ask users to do this I always give them examples by looking at the already published Polish, French, or German report but it would be helpful if we used one link to give examples to upcoming writers. Let me know what you think. Carmelapple 14:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you. Carmelapple 19:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re:Tłumaczenie miesiąca na WP-PL edit

Niestety, nie mam polskich materialow, wszysto od razu tlumaczylem na en. PS. Pewnie znasz, ale jesli nie masz na watchliscie, doradzam dodanie Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board do niej.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  12:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

MCOTW edit

 
Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Hepatitis C was selected.
Hope you can help…

NCurse   work 15:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Copyediting edit

Yes. Carmelapple 13:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Interwiki report edit

Just a heads-up: Carmelapple's left Wikipedia. I know you were handling a lot of the interwiki work...let me know if you need any help covering Carmelapple's end of the work. Ral315 (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Carmelapple said he would be able to cover any more reports and will be covering the Spetember 11th report on the Simple English Wikipedia but he said the Signpost would be one of the few things he would still do; so I imagine he might try and do something. ForestH2 t/c 03:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not comfortable with Carmelapple doing any more work for the Signpost. Ral315 (talk) 03:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reply about Signpost edit

Hello, Kpjas. Yes, if you need any help doing spell checks, copyediting before the article is published, I can do that. I'll be away for the 28th issue but I can do every issue besides that leading up to November. Yes, Carmelapple did have a dispute with Ral315, it was kind of stupid actully. I think my help won't be needed because Treebark is returning in October. So, I'll be happy to help, just leave a message on my talkpage explaning what I need to do. Fbv65edel and me are going to do the Simple English report on Spetember 11th. Please reply on my talkpage. Thanks. ForestH2 t/c 14:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Admin edit

I just saw your wonderful contributions, and I think you could become an adminnistrator. Would you like to become one? I would love to nominate you. ForestH2 03:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kpjas. ForestH2 t/c 15:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi, the Italian Wikipedia report for next week we'll not be ready in time for publication as I won't be able to get enough news out there; so I've written a report. The person who was supposed to write a report informed me he would be out of town and wouldn't be able to do it. ForestH2 t/c 21:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but I won't be here for the 28th. The user just cancled on me; but I'm not going to get another user for the Italian Wiki, if you want to that's fine. If it comes down to that; then you can always use my interwiki report which I did. It's not much just a little status and that's it. ForestH2 t/c 22:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your Signpost / Interwiki Report question edit

Hi, about your question about the The Interwiki Report.. not much comments, except for the fact that the thing making that particular newspaper coverage worth the news is that Helsingin Sanomat is the biggest subscription newspaper in Finland and the Nordic Countries. So maybe that could be mentioned too. --TJ 12:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

That's a good idea. No the other one's not ready for publication. Can you form Tixiod, who's doing the Spanish that his report will be due on the 27th and maybe we can get someone to write the report for the 4th for the Italian Wiki. ForestH2 t/c 13:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

O.K, espanol the 28th, and Italian the 4. ForestH2 t/c 16:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hmm... I'll be starting school this week, so I may not have as much time as I would like, but I'll get started on it ASAP, and hopefully will have it ready by next week. Titoxd(?!?) 05:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your RfA edit

I have left some optional questions for you on your RfA. Tyrenius 10:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have left one more question, and another user a supplementary question. Both are optional. Tyrenius 00:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Status of Bengali wikipedia edit

Hi, I'd like to add a report for the Bengali wikipedia. Could you please add it to the schedule of interwiki reports? I've posted a comment in the talk page about this : User:Treebark/Table. Thanks. --Ragib 05:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Report from Italian wikipedia edit

The article is currently work in progress here... As you see, there's not much more else to be done... Please tell me the exact day in which we have to send you the final version... Thanks! --Gia.cossa 07:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

PS: by the way, if you have any suggestions to improve it...

Guenter Grass at list of Poles edit

why? he's mother was Polish (Kashubian).

undeliverable email edit

I sent the following email to you, but your address is incorrect and it was returned:

Dear Doctor Krzysztof, Congratulations on your long time contributions to Wikipedia! I just came across your User page while checking the history of one of the pages about Poland. In June 2006 I started writing articles to the English Wikipedia (specifically about Oflag and Stalags, while somebody still remembers what they were) and Polish Wikipedia. In the latter I have been criticized because of my mistakes in Polish which have caused other Wikipedians extra work! Incidentally my first article in both Wikipedias was about Dr. Mirosław Vitali, when I was astounded to find no references to him at all, anywhere. For many years I have been running my own web-sie http://biega.com, but I am concerned that when I finally kick the bucket nobody will maintain it and all the work I have done will be lost. Hopefully one of my grandsons will continue to maintain it. Z serdecznym uściskiem

Syrenab 14:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations edit

You're now an admin on en.wikipedia. We're glad to have your experience from the Polish wiki to add some additional insight in ways to approach issues. Just make sure to read through the admin reading list to stay familiar with the way we do things here where different. Dig in an help out with the backlogs when you can and don't hesitate to ask for help if you need it. Again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 14:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'll just add my congrats under Taxman's. Congratulations, Kpjas! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 01:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
 
Admin cake for Kpjas! (It was half-price because it says "Happy Birthday Susan"). ;)

Hey, no problem. I was glad to support you: I think we need to look to our past to see our future clearly, and a good way to do that is to pay attention to the folks who were there when it all began. You're ovbiously very dedicated to the whole Wikimedia project (42,000 edits is insane!). So, congrats! And have some cake! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 06:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Italian Report for Wikipedia Signpost! edit

Hi! Italian Report for Wikipedia Signpost is ready! You can get it from here... I don't know if the correct contact-person is you or ForestH2, so I wrote to both! The article was written principally by Under and me, with various helps by the it.wiki community (especially the ones reported in history of the page + Piero Tasso and Hellisp)... Tomorrow I'll leave for a holiday-week: please ask the Italian Bar (or one of those people) if there are any troubles... --Gia.cossa 15:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

By the way: congratulations for your election! --Gia.cossa 15:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I fixed something... I also updated statistics, because they were more than two weeks old... By the way, maybe it's better to speak about the Wikimedia Italia Meeting using the past tense, as it has just concluded... Please check the corrections... --Gia.cossa 10:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Right! No it.wikispecies yet... You can remove the reference! Thanks! --Gia.cossa 09:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Spanish Wikipedia report edit

It's done, and it's available at User:Titoxd/Interwiki report. Just poke me a few hours before publication, so I can update the statistics in the first section. Thanks! Titoxd(?!?) 20:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stephen Hales edit

I'm sorry.--Ricardo Carneiro Pires 16:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof! edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kpjas! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 12:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Back edit

I'm back from my vacation, thanks for all your help with the signpost during my trip. ForestH2 t/c 01:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply