{{HK-sports-venue-stub}}

edit

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Craigengower Cricket Club

edit
 

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Craigengower Cricket Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Craigengower Cricket Club

edit
 

Craigengower Cricket Club, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Craigengower Cricket Club satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craigengower Cricket Club and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Craigengower Cricket Club during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 03:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kowlooner~enwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not Instantnood.

Decline reason:

Your contribution history suggests otherwise.— Mr.Z-man 06:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why? Just because I edit about similar topics as he did? Kowlooner 06:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
In exactly the same way? Orderinchaos 11:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
What do you mean? Kowlooner (talk) 18:06, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kowlooner~enwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not Instantnood.

Decline reason:

And you're still not being unblocked, either. If you post a third unblock with exactly the same argument, we'll be protecting the page to prevent further frivolity. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your account will be renamed

edit

01:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

15:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)