Kosi Onochie

May 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing (excessive page moves) and failutre to address talk-page concerns. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Miniapolis 22:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ignoring your talk page. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

• You can blank everything except for the block notices. Those must remain. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing the block notices. As per the note from Tokyogirl79 above, these must remain. If you carry on removing this I will revoke your talk page access. Thanks in advance for your co-operation.--5 albert square (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kosi Onochie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been hacked, below link is the proof that my account was accessed elsewhere.

Decline reason:

If that is true, then the indefinite block on this account must stand, per WP:COMPROMISED; thus, unblock declined. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kosi Onochie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been hacked, below link is the proof that my account was accessed elsewhere.

Decline reason:

Only one request at a time please. There is no link below. If the account is compromised, it stays blocked. If it isn't, you stay blocked anyway. Peridon (talk) 13:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney XD (Europe, Middle East and Africa) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 15:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)