AfC notification: Draft:Kiyanu Kim has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kiyanu Kim. Thanks! 333-blue 13:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiyanu Kim (March 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 06:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Korpuskripsi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl oh hello! 06:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiyanu Kim (March 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 17:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiyanu Kim (March 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiyanu Kim (April 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016 edit

The next time you editing a page, you may be blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Long-term disruption, same pattern. Multiple users including Special:Contributions/WickedDreamMusic and Special:Contributions/Drumtoad59. Multiple IPs from the New York area, including Special:Contributions/67.243.129.55 and Special:Contributions/207.87.174.138.

115.164.95.34 (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. 123.136.106.105 (talk) 07:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiyanu Kim (April 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tvx1 20:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kiyanu Kim 183.171.180.234 (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply