12/6/2018 Evaluation by NBasham1

edit

Spelling/Grammar: Nearly Meets Standards

edit
  • Mostly good, there are some run on sentences like the second to last sentence in integration. Over is capitalized incorrectly in the first paragraph. Just give each paragraph a once-over to make sure

Language: Meets Standards

edit
  • Seems good overall. Might want to tighten up professionalism on the first sentence of political response (receive hate).

Organization: Meets Standards

edit
  • The piece is well-organized. Remove spaces before and after history heading.

Coding: Nearly Meets Standards

edit
  • Need to put a Section Header for the Reference part

Validity: Exceeds Standards

edit
  • Everything seems valid

Completion: Meets Standards

edit
  • I can't think of anything to add

Relevance: Exceeds Standards

edit
  • All parts seem relevant to the topic.

Sources: Nearly Meets Standards

edit
  • The sources you have are good and what you'd expect, you're just short 4.

Citations: Meets Standards

edit
  • Don't see a problem here

References: Meets Standards

edit
  • Reference section is good.

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Koopnasty, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

12/6/18 Evaluation by Forrest C. Bevington

edit

Spelling/Grammar: Nearly Meets Standards

edit
  • The first paragraph has good information, but there seems to be quite a few run on sentences with multiple grammar mistakes.

Language: Meets Standards

edit
  • The language in your piece is good, but I think you could word your sentences better to create a better flow throughout your edit.

Organization: Meets Standards

edit
  • Excellent organization, the only thing I would change is the placement of the "Status Of Urkrainians in Poland" and "Documents for Foreigners" like try to center those two to look better in terms of presentation.

Coding: Exceeds Standards

edit
  • I don't see any issues with your code.

Validity: Exceeds Standards

edit
  • Your information seems to be very valid with great information.

Completion: Exceeds Standards

edit
  • Your piece is well written with great information. Not sure I see anything else that needs to be added.

Relevance: Meets Standards

edit
  • Information is relevant to the topic of choice.

Sources: Nearly Meets Standards

edit
  • You only have 16 so you need four more sources, but other than that sources look good.

Citations: Meets Standards

edit
  • Great citations throughout your piece, but as mentioned above, you need 4 more sources.

References: Meets Standards

edit
  • The references look good throughout your piece, but you could add a few more to create more professionalism.