Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you for getting a login account and contributing to Noah. Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not treat creationist sources as reliable. That's a basic practice here, and you'll find it to be true across all of Wikipedia's pages that intersect with the topic. The basic policies in dealing with what is and is not a reliable source can be found at WP:RS and WP:FRINGE, and you'll find that the majority of editors just about on any corner of Wikipedia will treat creationist material as falling outside of reliable sources. Alephb (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
So what sources would be considered reliable for a topic of harmonizing biblical accounts? It seems like evidence that seeks to harmonize biblical source material showing that a singular author is possible is simply discounted. But why can't evidence be presented? Konroh (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Konroh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Alephb (talk) 07:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
