Wecome to the Wikipedia

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 10:33, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

You reverted my contributions to Concurrent programming language

edit

Hello,

Welcome to the Wikipedia. I noticed that you changed the article on Concurrent programming language with just a bald claim. Since you did not provide any justification for your change, I fixed it up.--CarlHewitt 2005 July 5 21:54 (UTC)

It removes useful examples and requires the reader to have more background knowledge. Koffieyahoo 6 July 2005 06:28 (UTC)
Moreover, your latest changes alter the semantics of Concurrent programming languages, no longer is it the case that a programming language should provide linguistic constructs, which is essential, otherwise C is even a concurrent programming language. Koffieyahoo 6 July 2005 11:47 (UTC)
Good point. I added "linguistic constructs" to the definition.--CarlHewitt 2005 July 6 15:56 (UTC)
More moreover, you seem to be confused a bit: parallel and concurrent programming do not need shared objects, as demonstrated for example by message passing systems. Koffieyahoo 6 July 2005 18:04 (UTC)

I noticed that you made a few more changes by simply deleting stuff. So I fixed them up as well.--CarlHewitt 2005 July 6 05:41 (UTC)

All this is motivated in the summary. Your changes somehow have a feel of vanity and non-NPOV. If you refer to the actor model, you should also refer to any other model of computation which might be slightly relevant, which you don't do, and besides this is why the category structure and the what links here exist. Koffieyahoo 6 July 2005 06:28 (UTC)
The article also refers to Process calculi which are the other pricipal class of models of concurrency. Is there another one that you wouuld like to add as well?--CarlHewitt 2005 July 6 15:56 (UTC)

Erfurt Program

edit

Well, I`m not the intial author of Erfurt Program , but cleaned it up a bit, the reference to revolution is to the socialist one, yes. The Erfurst Program was one of the programs adopted by the early SPD, I`ll settle some things in the article , thank you for your comments. --Isolani 8 July 2005 14:47 (UTC)

You also reverted my contributions to Logic programming

edit

So I have added some discussion to the article.--Carl Hewitt 05:33, 13 July 2005 (UTC)Reply