Operating income Avianca

edit

Koentje787, Thank you for your modification in the Avianca page, you have made some corrections and clarifications to the article. however, I would like you to revise, and perhaps agree with me. in the revenue where it is stated 2.8 billion, you have defined this number as 1,000,000,000 which is correct in english. however this number has been obtained from an Spanish article from Avianca's website. 1 Billion in Spanish is not the same as 1 Billion in English. in Spanish 1 Billion is defined as 1,000,000,000,000 this therefore may cause some misinterpretations of this number.

I was who updated this numebr when the Avianca report was released, however I have also suggested to convert this figure to USD as this is a global unit and will not leed to misinterpretation.

PLEASE REPLY ON MY TALK SO I CAN SEE YOUR OPINION ABUT THIS MATTER.

DG (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Danielg1987,
Thank you for your comment. I was a bit confused about what you were saying, but now I understand what you mean. I didn't change anything of the operating income of Avianca, I only changed the ranks of the subsidiaries. I think it's more clarifying now because subsidiaries of the same country are next to eachother. I don't know who changed the number of the operating income, maybe you could search in the history of the Avianca-page.
With kind regards, --Koentje787 (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arkefly Curaçao

edit

Thank you for your edits on Arkefly Curaçao. In light of your proposed merger, I have removed the dated {{prod}} tag from that page and begun a merger discussion at Talk:Arkefly. Your comments are most welcome there. Cnilep (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Cnilep, thank you so much you deleted the {{prod}} tag. I will comment at the merger discussion as soon as possible.
With kind regards, --Koentje787 (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

KLM vloot

edit

Ik heb maar even op mijn eigen pagina gereageerd om alles overzichtelijk te houden. Schalkcity (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply