Knudknud

Welcome!

Hello, Knudknud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as John Lear, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Lear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Lear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Lear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Lear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from John Lear, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to John Lear. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

This is Knudknud, the user.

First, I did NOT remove a speedy deletion notice, but contested that it was earmarked as such and you can find my explanation behind the TALK button.

Second, give me a way to decently reply to these messages.

You did remove it. Please look at the "this edit" hyperlink above. - Amaury (talk) 23:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Fine, if this is the only way to connect, let it be.

Again, I don't believe I deleted the speedy delete notice, this must have happened as a result of a process. I did remove it the first time, not the second time.

Second, I'd like an explanation what on earth is wrong with my wikipedia lemma, as it is public and neutral information about a person with significance.

I will not accept bullshit reasons that the man is a nut because he obviously isn't, despite that he has some weird opinions. And even if he were a nut, he has done significant things that are noteworthy anyway. The man deserves a page.

By the way, this is the reason given for the flagging: "This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, is substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. See the previous discussion. See CSD G4."

This is total bullshit, because the text is totally original.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Lear

The article John Lear has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed complaint against Loriendrew

This is Knudknud, the creator of this lemma.

The article was already proposed for deletion 3 MINUTES after I created a stub. You didn't give me any time do it properly.

Considering your latest intervention that was supposedly about inserting a reference. At the moment you posted your criticism of this article here, it already had the required reliable reference and several links to other wikipedia articles.

This is now the fourth bullshit reason to delete this article. And again, you are making a problem out of nothing. I urge you to stop this bullshit and go play somewhere else. Your interventions considering this lemma amount to obstruction, are damaging to wikipedia and if you don't cease and desist with this immature behavior I will definitely file a complaint against you for administrator abuse.

I am copying the source code of the lemma so that in the case of deletion, the article will be back in a matter of minutes.

Besides that, I am screen printing everything here, so that others can see exactly what is going here.

Proposed deletion of John Lear

The article John Lear has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed complaint against Joseph2302

This is Knudknud, the creator of this lemma.

Will you for gods sake back off with what you are doing here and leave this article alone! What are you guys smoking? Are you on drugs or something? Or is there something wrong with your eyesight? This article already has 3 external references. Another wikipedia admin has already removed the earlier flag for deletion that was just as inappropriate as this one. If you don't remove this latest tag within 24 hours I will do it myself. You can continue with this bullshit for another 100 times, I will resurrect this article 101 times. And I'm printscreening everything. I'm fed up with this behavior.

Important notice: biographies of living persons and COVID-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michael Yeadon. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)