Your message at Requests for feedback edit

You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat
 
Hello, Knitgeek. I replied to your request for feedback.
Best regards, Tkotc (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC).Reply
feedback re Black Prairie article
I got your note and looked at the article again. To be honest, I don't recall how it looked at first, but it looks pretty good now. Just be aware that band articles are scrutinized. Accordingly, I suggest you posting again on Requests for Feedback just in case there is some angle I have missed but someone else spots. If I had to suggest an improvement at this point it would be that the article is still a little thin for a group that seems to have received adequate notice. Is there anything more about them worth saying? With one album perhaps a Discography sounds a bit much, but possibly it would be nice to have the bibliographic info about the album. Right now all a reader of the article has is the album's title. So one thought is to look at some discographies to see what should be there and how to do it nicely. I corrected a couple of minor formatting points (hyphenated term, put citations outside punctuation marks). So it looks good to me, but don't take just my word. Tkotc (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I looked at the article again and spiffied up one of the references. There is a pending discussion about merging a page about one of the group's albums into your band page. I think you should respond somehow. Personally I would go for it. Tkotc (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply