Speedy deletion nomination of DomLux edit

Hello Klasyk17,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DomLux for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DomLux edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DomLux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gronk Oz (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note: the previous CSD which was placed by @Kavdiamanju: was removed without any explanation by an anonymous IP editor.--Gronk Oz (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of DomLux for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DomLux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DomLux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note: the second CSD was also removed without any explanation by an anonymous IP editor. --Gronk Oz (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Boskovski edit

On the basis that he's never played in a fully-professional league, and so fails our notability guideline for footballers, WP:NFOOTY.

Now, may I ask you a couple of questions? Given that you haven't edited Wikipedia since January, how did you notice the article was up for deletion. And more importantly, are you Boskovski or someone close to him? Number 57 21:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes I am very close to him,there's references where he played.. if you can clarify the link he is mentioned as a pro football NOT amateur,he played somewhere in a non league club but currently is a free agent.
But he has not played in a fully professional league, so the references are not relevant. Please also read WP:Conflict of interest; I suggest you do not continue to edit this article. Number 57 22:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

No you're wrong.. Great Yarmouth isn't professional team and that's the problem. The clubs he played for are all from Macedonian premier league so don't understand what is your issue and on base of what you making a judgements and which authority? Will continue with this article .. for more information and evidence simply contact the football federation of Macedonia THE FA and Nike UK as he's their athlete too :) You are an Great Yarmouth FC editor with years so don't understand the mentality and your approach where is the loyality and respect for players who's played for your non professional team .. Regards,

No, I'm not wrong (nor am I a Yarmouth editor). The Macedonian league is not fully professional - we have a list of which leagues are fully professional and which are not at WP:FPL, and you can see what the Macedonian league is classed as. Number 57 22:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kristijan Boskovski. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kristijan Boskovski edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kristijan Boskovski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recreation of the Boskovski article edit

Please do not recreate pages that have been deleted as a result of an AfD. Thanks, Number 57 09:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply