Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Audio Blueprint

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Audio Blueprint, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.linkedin.com/company/audio-blueprint.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Audio Blueprint

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Audio Blueprint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 19:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Kkaulani. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Audio Blueprint, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The Dissident Aggressor 00:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kimo Kaulani has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kimo Kaulani was changed by Kkaulani (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879209 on 2015-04-21T06:12:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Audio Blueprint

edit

Hi there. This page has been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Blueprint. Please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review if you would like to proceed. However I would urge you to read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Promotion before continuing as it would appear your article fails to comply with either guideline. Thanks. Glen 08:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Kimo Kaulani. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Dissident Aggressor 16:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kimo Kaulani. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. The Dissident Aggressor 16:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Kimo Kaulani, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You are not free to call other editors Nazis on Wikipedia. The Dissident Aggressor 16:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

SPI / Block evasion

edit

I think I've figured out your pattern of using multiple sockpuppets and IPsocks to use Wikipedia to promote your partner, Geri King and your family of companies. Note that using multiple accounts, evading an active block and using Wikipedia for promotion are all against policy.

I have opened a formal complaint against you in this Sockpuppet Investigation. The Dissident Aggressor 17:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Geri King for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geri King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geri King until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 21:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply