Kiste11

I'm an user from the german Wikipedia. Please contact me on my german talk page.

---

Proposed deletion of Tommy Snider

The article Tommy Snider has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 07:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Tinsley Price moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tinsley Price, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources.

What is needed to demonstrate notability is newspaper articles etc. that discuss her (her specifically, not just productions she appeared in) in some detail. User-generated content like IMDB is not considered reliable, and unsuitable for this purpose.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

@Elmidae: Thank you for your notice. I have edited the article. Could you review it and give me a feedback? This would be very nice. --Kiste11(Talk) 16:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm afraid the current sourcing in the draft would not be regarded as sufficient :/ Both famousbirthdays.com and fandom.com are user-generated content, which is regarded as not reliable. This, BTW, includes Wikipedia - we wouldn't be allowed to reference ourselves under this guideline! The German source is of a suitable typ (even if it's rather light on content), but one single reliable source is not going to be enough; we need multiple, to show that general independent coverage exists. You may want to have a look at the detailed guidelines at WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. - Consider that for some people the coverage just isn't there; it is often not possible to assemble sufficient sources for notability in the WP sense from dribs and drabs on the internet. In such a case, we just have to wait until the real world takes the trouble to put sufficient material into print so we can use it. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Kiste11: Moving this repeatedly back to mainspace is disruptive. You've yet to include a single reliable source, so please stop as it is disruptive. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: I really think that there are enough sources for an article. Could you tell me what the problem is? --Kiste11(Talk) 15:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Kiste11 The number of sources are irrelevant because the sources you included are absolutely and completely unreliable. Wikia, famousbirthdays, celebsmoney are all unacceptable and should be blacklisted as they aren't reliable and serve no encyclopedic value. Second this is a WP:BLP so the sourcing MUST be up to par, especially considering that it's about a very young minor. You'd need to provide coverage in independent reliable sources which are subject to editorial oversight and have written about Tinsley in great detail (like the New York Times, as an easy example.) Praxidicae (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tinsley Price concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tinsley Price, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tinsley Price

Hello, Kiste11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tinsley Price".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)