Welcome! edit

Hello, Kishalay Mukherjee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  - Timbaaa -> ping me 13:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mayapur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You're removing content, as you did to Mayapur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. As you're a new editor in Wikipedia, I'm advising you to read the simple rules for editing Wikipedia and also the editing policy. Be bold, but not reckless.বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mayapur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing! edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been warned twice before yet you continue defying those warnings. Please carefully read the three revert rule. You're using unreliable sources like mayapur.com etc., which may promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. You have to familiar with WP:RS, WP:SPS. Don't remove or change the sourced content.বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 05:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Clarify edit

I've removed this source from Mayapur wikipage, because this source not specifically says in which parameter(height, area etc.) it is largest. I may be wrong but clarify the parameter. As par wikipedia, Pashupatinath Temple is the largest temple(parameter is area) and Vrindavan Chandrodaya Mandir is the tallest temple (Parameter is height, 213 m) in the world (TOVP is 113m). If I'm wrong please notify me. Thank you. বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 06:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why! edit

  The source you have used in Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is clearly specifies Nabadwip as the birth place of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. See this, this. "The seed of the tree was first sown in Navadvīpa, the birth site of Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and then the tree was brought to Puruṣottama-kṣetra (Jagannātha Purī), and then to Vṛndāvana." (Chapter 9) or "First Lord Kṛṣṇa made His parents and elders appear. Then Kṛṣṇa Himself, with the sentiments and complexion of Rādhikā, appeared in Navadvīpa, like the full moon, from the womb of mother Śacī, which is like an ocean of pure milk."(Chapter 4). And the most important, all the biographies like the Chaitanya Charitamrita of Krishnadasa Kaviraja, Chaitanya Bhagavata of Vrindavana Dasa, Chaitanya Mangala written by "Lochana Dasa", Caitanya Caritāmṛta Mahākavya by Kavi Karnapura and Śrī Kṛṣṇa Caitanya Carita Maha-Kavya by Murari Gupta etc. clearly said Nabadwip as the birthplace. Even the source you've used aslo. It seems like that you are trying to establish your biased point of view. You have been warned before and your edit has been reverted many times by various editor, including me. Please stop disruptive editing. Try to contribute in Wikipedia with neutral point of view. Wikipedia doesn't support original research. You must families with Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Thank You. বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply