Kiran Kirak
April 2016
edit
Your addition to Sardaar Gabbar Singh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect facts
editYour edit here has been reverted. The source doesn't mention overall critical response. Please double-check your submissions to be sure that the content you are adding is supported by the reference you are adding. Additionally, we don't arbitrarily track audience response unless it comes from a reliable source like CinemaScore. Please familiarize yourself with MOS:FILM if you intend to edit film articles. It's an invaluable resource that will save you a lot of headaches. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Duniya Rashmi
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Duniya Rashmi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella Velella Talk 12:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC) |
As noted, Nagendra NJ, you are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia, so all your changes have been reverted. Since you continue to waste other editors' time with policy violations, your efforts will be wasted as well. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)