Kingo7672, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Kingo7672! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

edit

thank you for the welcoming! ,i am glad to be here! ,thanks for the invitation. (Kingo7672 (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC))April 3 ,2016 19:06(Kingo7672 (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC))Reply

Commas

edit

Commas go before the space in sentences. DarkKnight2149 22:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

On Neutral Point of View

edit

Hey there. Your recent edits to Suicide Squad (film) were useful, nice job. This is just a friendly notice about a policy called WP:Neutral Point of View which you way of heard of - the premise section you added to sounded somewhat promotional and so I've reverted that part of your edit. I'd suggest that you take a bit of time to read the policy so you can improve your own editing. If you have any questions please let me know, thanks   ~NottNott|talk 15:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

 Getting Started on  

edit

Please, click around! These easily navigable links should be indepesensable to the new user.

    How to edit a page
    Tutorial
    Sandbox, the place where you can experiment
    Where to ask a question.
    What this site is based on
    Manual of Style
    What Wikipedia is not

Here are some ways you can help improve Wikipedia:

    Create an article
    Help remove vandalism
    Translate an article
    Improve illustrations and upload new images
    Perform maintenance tasks
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Contribute mottos to Motto of the Day
  Buster Seven Talk 12:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

Kingo7672 (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)I'm sorry on this thing ,you can be sure that i will not do it once again ,trust me ,and thanks for the warning!12:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • You're welcome. It's important that you read and understand our policies regarding WP:V, so that you don't continue to make changes and add content to articles without supplying reliable sources. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

Kingo7672 (talk)*Hello ,dear user, it seems that following your message ,i can edit articles only usage "edit source" and not as normally with "edit" mode ,if you know what i mean. Thank you anyway.14:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Trying to be clear about this

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richard Donner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Thus far other editors have granted a lot of leeway, since you're new and appear to have constructive purposes. But many, if not most of your edits have been reverted, and it seems necessary for others to follow behind and check your contributions. Once again, we can not accept unsourced content or original research, per WP:NOR. Thank you, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is that really the plot of Civil War?

edit

You saw the movie already!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.233.123.175 (talk) 17:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

There have already been screenings of the film, so the user probably has if he added the plot. DarkKnight2149 00:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is that really the plot of Civil War?

edit

Kingo7672 (talk)No, this is not the full plot of the movie (and i didn't see it) ,firstly ,i'm he and not (s)he ,second ,this was the script who was putted on a website ,i don't recalled the name ,but i wanted to put the script that was shown in this website.Kingo7672 (talk) 09:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.252.221.55 (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Star Wars: The Force Awakens. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Cable (comics). Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commas (again)

edit

Can you please stop putting commas in the incorrect place? I have already informed you that commas always go before the space in senteces. DarkKnight2149 17:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commas

edit

This is slowly starting to border on disruptive editing. Please stop putting the space before commas in sentences. DarkKnight2149 13:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commas

edit

I'm sorry ,i will not return on it once again ,sorry about that ,you can trust me ,this is my word ,it won't return once again. Kingo7672 (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)User:Kingo 767218:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)~Reply

April 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fast 8. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 08:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fast 8. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you can't make proper contributions to the site and just decide to make random, unnecessary edits all over the place, then you shouldn't be editing here at all. You've been given multiple warnings, so please take the hint. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 13:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

I want to contribute the Wikipedia ,i got your warnings over and over ,and i will fix my behaviour.13:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)User:Kingo767213:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 16:42 ,24 April 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for constant disruptive editing, socking as 86.187.160.0/20, bad faith editing.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dennis Brown - 01:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

11:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Please unblock me, i will promise you that it's not will return once again ,please unblock me ,you will see a different result. Kingo7672 (talk) 11:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Kingo767211:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm pretty sure I've seen this "see a different me" claim before, although I don't have a diff handy. I think you should accept that Wikipedia is not a proper hobby for you, and that you should seek something else to occupy your time. I wish you well. Dennis Brown - 13:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
To be precise: [3], [4], [5]. DarkKnight2149 22:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply